Customers sue LinkedIn over improper use of email addresses
Several LinkedIn customers are none to happy with the worlds largest professional social network.
September 23, 2013 at 06:51 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Several LinkedIn customers are none to happy with the world's largest professional social network.
In a recent complaint filed against LinkedIn, a group of the social media site's users are claiming the company hacked into their user accounts, collected their contact's email addresses, then used those email addresses for marketing purposes. The suit asks a California judge to ban LinkedIn from continuing to engage in this activity and to force it to return any revenue it brought in as a result of this practice.
A LinkedIn spokesman said the suit is without merit and the company plans to fight it. “LinkedIn is committed to putting our members first, which includes being transparent about how we protect and utilize our members' data,” Doug Madey told Bloomberg in an email.
But according to the complaint, LinkedIn made the members hand over an external e-mail address as their usernames on its site, then used the information to access their external e-mail accounts when they were left open.
“LinkedIn pretends to be that user and downloads the e-mail addresses contained anywhere in that account to LinkedIn's servers,” the plaintiffs said in the complaint. “LinkedIn is able to download these addresses without requesting the password for the external e-mail accounts or obtaining users' consent.”
In a blog post on LinkedIn's site, Blake Lawit, the company's senior director of litigation, says the accusations are simply not true.
“The lawsuit alleges that we 'break into' the email accounts of our members who choose to upload their email address books to LinkedIn. Quite simply, this is not true,” Lawit writes. “We do not access your email account without your permission. Claims that we 'hack' or 'break into' members' accounts are false. We never deceive you by 'pretending to be you' in order to access your email account. We never send messages or invitations to join LinkedIn on your behalf to anyone unless you have given us permission to do so.”
The plaintiffs are asking for class action status on the suit and are seeking a jury trial.
Read more about this story on Bloomberg.
See more InsideCounsel stories about social media companies:
Social media: boon to business or compliance death trap?
In advance of IPO, Twitter GC steps down
California faces cybersecurity expert deficiency
Litigation: When discovery of social media makes sense in civil cases
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
- 2Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 3Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 4'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 5Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
