Sara Moss, General Counsel, The Estée Lauder Companies
Moss, executive vice president and general counsel of The Este Lauder Companies, has a diverse background in the legal industry, from serving as a clerk for a U.S. District Judge to serving as senior litigation partner at Howard, Smith & Levin (now Covington & Burling), a New York City-based law...
September 26, 2013 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
Between juggling a thriving career in law and raising her four children, Sara Moss has been a consummate woman on the move, stopping little to rest along the way over the past 30 years. Moss, executive vice president and general counsel of The Estée Lauder Companies, has a diverse background in the legal industry, from serving as a clerk for a U.S. District Judge to serving as senior litigation partner at Howard, Smith & Levin (now Covington & Burling), a New York City-based law firm, and later as GC of not one, but two, Fortune 500 companies. Before joining Estée Lauder in 2003, Moss served
as the general counsel of Pitney Bowes for five years. When the company's then chief executive, Michael Critelli, recruited her, there were fewer than 10 female CEOs in the United States. Today, with just over 4 percent of CEO positions in the Fortune 500 currently held by women, Moss is part of a small but slowly growing faction of senior-level executive women.
When she was recruited to Estée Lauder 10 years ago, Moss says she was attracted to the company's values, and the opportunities and challenges the job presented. Since graduating law school in 1974, Moss has taken a similar approach to each role she has held, each providing the opportunity to hone her decidedly unique skills as a corporate attorney.
“It was hard and very challenging but very rewarding. I am not sure I have slept much in 30 years,” Moss says with a laugh. “But my job enabled me to have the support I needed. I tried not to travel too much. It was it a lot of juggling.”
Although Moss's children are now in their 20s and she has attained what she calls her “dream job” as GC of Esteé Lauder, Moss is not resting on her laurels. InsideCounsel recently had an opportunity to catch up with Moss to talk about her biggest challenges as GC as well as what makes the job so rewarding. Below is our full exchange.
Q: What do you like about in-house work vs. private practice?
A: What I really love about being in house is I feel I can make a long-term, positive contribution to a really great company. Estée Lauder is a great company and I feel I can make broad and long-term positive contributions. When I was a litigation partner, I would be called into really difficult situations and I would try to help solve those in a positive way, but I would parachute in and parachute out. As GC here, I am able to provide more long-term solutions to a broad set of problems.
Q: Do you prefer working in-house to law firm work?
A: Yes. The range of issues that come across my desk as GC is unbelievable. Apart from being a federal judge, if you are GC of a global company, the range of problems you help solve is so wide-ranging and diverse that it keeps the job challenging and exciting. In a given day I will deal with issues in Russia, China and in the U.S., real estate and antitrust. There are many issues a public company has to deal with. As a litigator in a law firm, you have very big cases and you tend to be focused on the few big cases. What I really love is the diversity and the ability to make a contribution in a long-term, broad and deep way.
Q: What's important to know about Estée Lauder?
A: We have 30 great brands. We are a global company and the global leader in prestige beauty. We do not do mass produce and we are in over 150 countries. In the 10 years that I have been here, the big news is how global we are and the emerging markets are the areas of greatest opportunities. We have approximately 40,000 employees around the world; we are global yet we are a very family-values based company. (Esteé Lauder is the grandmother of the company's executive chairman, William Lauder.) We are very involved in breast cancer work, Alzheimer's research and the MAC AIDS Fund. I think those strong family values in a public company make it really special.
Q: Tell me about the work your legal team does.
A: We do the full range of legal work except that we don't handle litigation; we support litigation. We always have outside counsel for an acquisition. The range of work of our in-house team includes IP, employment law, commercial law, real estate, claims and claim support, corporate governance, securities filings/board works, antitrust law and government relations. Our global securities team reports to me since they are involved in anti-counterfeit work. We have a team of 36 lawyers inNew York and four outside ofNew York.
Q: Are there any specialized skills you've developed by working at a cosmetics company, as opposed to another kind of company?
A: To some extent every public company has many similarities. There are two aspects of my work where I have honed my skills. In the claims area with our advertising, we have to substantiate our claims in a highly competitive market. When you open any page of a beauty magazine, there is another company telling you why you should by their product. Every single word is carefully substantiated and that was an area that I was not as familiar with. The regulatory landscape around the world – understanding the global regulatory framework – is something I had a general understanding of before but not nearly as deep.China is a big area of opportunity for us. I spend a lot of time working on some of the problems and challenges there. Those are areas of expertise that have grown dramatically for me. Trademark is another one. Every product has a name; every perfume bottle has a shape. It's the biggest group in our legal department. As we expand globally, trademark protection is critical.
Q: What is the most rewarding part of your job?
A: There are two parts: Being able to make a positive contribution to the company's success. That is a real fun part of the job. The real fun and challenge is when you can combine your legal expertise and business expertise to really help the company have a competitive edge. Working closely with our CEO and our senior team is spectacular. We have a really talented group of executives and it is a lot of fun for me to be part of that team. Another rewarding part of my job is mentoring other lawyers. We have a very talented group of lawyers. Working with them, mentoring them and helping them to be successful has been very rewarding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCompliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect
State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
3 minute readFired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250