Several key steps can direct legal department lawyers down the path to business partnership
One of the real benefits of being a general counsel is the opportunity to blend a role as legal counsel with that of strategic business adviser. I have given some thought over the past few months about how to wear these multiple hats and how to develop a legal team...
September 26, 2013 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
One of the real benefits of being a general counsel is the opportunity to blend a role as legal counsel with that of strategic business adviser. I have given some thought over the past few months about how to wear these multiple hats and how to develop a legal team that also gets comfortable with this dual role without over-identifying with the business team. There are a few key ingredients to developing this comfort, but we should never lose sight of our role as gatekeeper and our obligation to promote a culture of compliance and ethics.
Clear understanding and alignment on risk tolerance. As my team and I begin to prepare for 2014, we are first stepping back and ensuring we understand what the near-, medium- and long-term goals of our business are and how this blends with corporate strategy. Our goal is to support our company's growth and—to the extent of continued entry into emerging markets—M&A or other high-risk/high-reward items that are part of these business plans. We also work to ensure that we understand not only the risk tolerance of the business, but also any potential shifts in the risk tolerance of the corporation as a result, so that we either keep up with these shifts or discuss the implications of the same with the management team and the board of directors.
In addition, we develop strategies for how to support both the determination of risk tolerance and risk mitigation. For example, we are looking at how we can start to implement legal, compliance and enterprise level risk assessments into the decision-making processes of our divisions, so that they can factor these potential risks in as they do their own market level assessments, while also crafting mitigation plans. We are also organizing enterprise risk workshops within each of our divisions and on the corporate and functional level, the output of which will flow into heat maps, risk dashboards and, ultimately, the long-range planning process.
Involvement in business-level strategic planning. One of the clear steps we have taken over the past few years is to embed our lawyers in the business as business partners, so that they can obtain a bottoms-up understanding of the operations themselves. This is a win-win for both the business and the lawyers who start to become comfortable and proficient in how the divisions are run and why certain decisions are made, so that clear legal input can be provided early in the decision-making process. To combat the risk of over-identifying with the business team, strong relationships with the legal team are maintained.
Optimizing legal department operations. We are also working to build a legal function that can best meet the evolving needs of the business by striking the right balance between fixed and variable costs (i.e., striking a balance between an optimized in-house legal function and the use of outside counsel, legal process outsourcing and other support). This is a true balancing act. We have recently surveyed our business teams in an effort to determine the best methods for delivery of legal services, and when and how our lawyers need to be involved, and look forward to using the survey results to better inform how we operate.
Above all, develop new skills. As your business continually transforms itself and plans for the future, be willing to develop the skills your corporation will need from you and your team on a go-forward basis (executive MBA anyone?), so that the focus is always on adding value or repositioning to ensure that value is being added.
A. Verona Dorch is vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary at Harsco Corp.
One of the real benefits of being a general counsel is the opportunity to blend a role as legal counsel with that of strategic business adviser. I have given some thought over the past few months about how to wear these multiple hats and how to develop a legal team that also gets comfortable with this dual role without over-identifying with the business team. There are a few key ingredients to developing this comfort, but we should never lose sight of our role as gatekeeper and our obligation to promote a culture of compliance and ethics.
Clear understanding and alignment on risk tolerance. As my team and I begin to prepare for 2014, we are first stepping back and ensuring we understand what the near-, medium- and long-term goals of our business are and how this blends with corporate strategy. Our goal is to support our company's growth and—to the extent of continued entry into emerging markets—M&A or other high-risk/high-reward items that are part of these business plans. We also work to ensure that we understand not only the risk tolerance of the business, but also any potential shifts in the risk tolerance of the corporation as a result, so that we either keep up with these shifts or discuss the implications of the same with the management team and the board of directors.
In addition, we develop strategies for how to support both the determination of risk tolerance and risk mitigation. For example, we are looking at how we can start to implement legal, compliance and enterprise level risk assessments into the decision-making processes of our divisions, so that they can factor these potential risks in as they do their own market level assessments, while also crafting mitigation plans. We are also organizing enterprise risk workshops within each of our divisions and on the corporate and functional level, the output of which will flow into heat maps, risk dashboards and, ultimately, the long-range planning process.
Involvement in business-level strategic planning. One of the clear steps we have taken over the past few years is to embed our lawyers in the business as business partners, so that they can obtain a bottoms-up understanding of the operations themselves. This is a win-win for both the business and the lawyers who start to become comfortable and proficient in how the divisions are run and why certain decisions are made, so that clear legal input can be provided early in the decision-making process. To combat the risk of over-identifying with the business team, strong relationships with the legal team are maintained.
Optimizing legal department operations. We are also working to build a legal function that can best meet the evolving needs of the business by striking the right balance between fixed and variable costs (i.e., striking a balance between an optimized in-house legal function and the use of outside counsel, legal process outsourcing and other support). This is a true balancing act. We have recently surveyed our business teams in an effort to determine the best methods for delivery of legal services, and when and how our lawyers need to be involved, and look forward to using the survey results to better inform how we operate.
Above all, develop new skills. As your business continually transforms itself and plans for the future, be willing to develop the skills your corporation will need from you and your team on a go-forward basis (executive MBA anyone?), so that the focus is always on adding value or repositioning to ensure that value is being added.
A. Verona Dorch is vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary at Harsco Corp.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250