JP Morgan still in talks with DOJ on settlement
Both sides are remaining tight lipped about details of an agreement, and any suspected deals are still fully capable of imploding.
September 27, 2013 at 08:15 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After initial rumblings that JP Morgan Chase was in talks with multiple government agencies to settle out of court over bad mortgage securities the bank offered during the run up to the financial crisis, not much has changed. Both sides are remaining tight lipped about details of an agreement, and any suspected deals are still fully capable of imploding.
Thus far, it has been reported that JP offered to pay roughly $11 billion to clear itself of a potential suit in California. $7 billion of that would be paid out in fines to the Justice Department and $4 billion would go to struggling homeowners.
This settlement could allow JP Morgan to avoid costly litigation from multiple government entities that could tie the bank up in court for years. The settlement would be the largest in history for a single company.
An hour-long meeting on Sept. 26 between JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon and Attorney General is seen as a positive sign of things moving forward. Questions remain as to whether or not the amount JP has offered to pay is enough.
According to The Wall Street Journal, “Among the biggest sticking points is whether J.P. Morgan will admit wrongdoing as part of a settlement.” This is something that the government has been pushing for. JP is also reportedly hoping to win a guarantee that follow up investigations from other entities and agencies will be halted as a result of the payout, but there has been no word on whether this is part of the conversation or not.
All of this comes in what has been a bumpy month for JP, with the bank already having agreed to pay fines in excess of a billion dollars related to a derivative trading scandal and a credit card marketing violation, while still under investigation for the former.
Talks are expected to go well in to next week, but we'll have more as soon as official word on this huge settlement has been released.
After initial rumblings that
Thus far, it has been reported that JP offered to pay roughly $11 billion to clear itself of a potential suit in California. $7 billion of that would be paid out in fines to the Justice Department and $4 billion would go to struggling homeowners.
This settlement could allow
An hour-long meeting on Sept. 26 between
According to The Wall Street Journal, “Among the biggest sticking points is whether J.P. Morgan will admit wrongdoing as part of a settlement.” This is something that the government has been pushing for. JP is also reportedly hoping to win a guarantee that follow up investigations from other entities and agencies will be halted as a result of the payout, but there has been no word on whether this is part of the conversation or not.
All of this comes in what has been a bumpy month for JP, with the bank already having agreed to pay fines in excess of a billion dollars related to a derivative trading scandal and a credit card marketing violation, while still under investigation for the former.
Talks are expected to go well in to next week, but we'll have more as soon as official word on this huge settlement has been released.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250