Boardroom dynamics: an insider’s view
Experts advise general counsel on building relationships with the board, understanding the necessary processes and decoding board members personalities.
October 03, 2013 at 09:31 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
New general counsel navigating the boardroom are faced with a myriad of challenges: building relationships with the board, understanding the necessary processes, and decoding board members' personalities, to name but a few.
Christine Edwards, capital partner at Winston & Strawn and Peggy Foran, chief governance officer, vice president and corporate secretary at Prudential Financial, were among the panelists during an invitation-only gathering at the Women, Influence and Power in the Law conference Washington, D.C.
“Half of the battle is knowing the comfort level in the boardroom,” Edwards said. One way to get a pulse on what that comfort level is us through executive sessions during committee meetings.
“In committees, they are very different because the committees is where the senior management are far more actively involved,” Edwards explained. “It gives members of management further down in the organization a chance to engage with many of the directors.”
While annual meetings may seem like a necessary evil to leaders of public companies, they are very important to the board.
“It's a process. The CEO of the company has to go through 'what are my questions.' I think the point of this is to respect the fact that directors take that very seriously,” Edwards explained. “Shareholders and investors and activists are using those communications in so many different instances to talk to the directors of the board about their expectations.”
Foran advises inside counsel to provide board updates to disseminate to executive officers and board members.
“I search the board members and their companies. I get to know their corporate secretary or general counsel … because of board dynamics, people in a group will act a little differently,” Foran said. “Do your homework so you can understand them and understand what their industry is so you can understand what their issues are.”
Culture is another area where GCs need to understand, according to Paula Cholmondeley, an independent director who sits on the board of Terex.
“Get to know the culture of your board. They are the highest self-directed part of the team. Those positions are at best the first among equal,” Cholmondeley said. “Understand where you company fits on the scale of best practice within corporate governance. At Terex, we have an open forum on compensation just before their annual meeting. Really understand what are both the written and non-written best practices of that company and where are they on the scale of leading edge.”
Edwards added, “If you think about what it is like to govern a company you realize how important it is to work on the culture and that is to work on relationships with one another. Shareholders are the ones that elect new directors, but it's also an opportunity for directors to say 'we need a new process.' You have to think about what is the right governance profile.”
New general counsel navigating the boardroom are faced with a myriad of challenges: building relationships with the board, understanding the necessary processes, and decoding board members' personalities, to name but a few.
Christine Edwards, capital partner at
“Half of the battle is knowing the comfort level in the boardroom,” Edwards said. One way to get a pulse on what that comfort level is us through executive sessions during committee meetings.
“In committees, they are very different because the committees is where the senior management are far more actively involved,” Edwards explained. “It gives members of management further down in the organization a chance to engage with many of the directors.”
While annual meetings may seem like a necessary evil to leaders of public companies, they are very important to the board.
“It's a process. The CEO of the company has to go through 'what are my questions.' I think the point of this is to respect the fact that directors take that very seriously,” Edwards explained. “Shareholders and investors and activists are using those communications in so many different instances to talk to the directors of the board about their expectations.”
Foran advises inside counsel to provide board updates to disseminate to executive officers and board members.
“I search the board members and their companies. I get to know their corporate secretary or general counsel … because of board dynamics, people in a group will act a little differently,” Foran said. “Do your homework so you can understand them and understand what their industry is so you can understand what their issues are.”
Culture is another area where GCs need to understand, according to Paula Cholmondeley, an independent director who sits on the board of Terex.
“Get to know the culture of your board. They are the highest self-directed part of the team. Those positions are at best the first among equal,” Cholmondeley said. “Understand where you company fits on the scale of best practice within corporate governance. At Terex, we have an open forum on compensation just before their annual meeting. Really understand what are both the written and non-written best practices of that company and where are they on the scale of leading edge.”
Edwards added, “If you think about what it is like to govern a company you realize how important it is to work on the culture and that is to work on relationships with one another. Shareholders are the ones that elect new directors, but it's also an opportunity for directors to say 'we need a new process.' You have to think about what is the right governance profile.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250