FanDuel wins big victory for daily fantasy sports’ legality
Are daily fantasy sites truly distinguishable from casino gambling? According to one U.S. district court, absolutely
October 11, 2013 at 07:46 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
At this point, even if most people don't play fantasy sports, they at least know what it is: You pick a team for the entire season based on real-life players, you make trades within your league, and you get made fun of by your peers if you finish in last place. It's that simple.
However, daily fantasy sports are slightly different. You only select a team for a given day, and often, you pay an entry fee to compete against others for a daily grand prize. For many websites such as FanDuel.com, daily fantasy games are the lifeblood of their company.
But recently, a U.S. district court answered a very important question: How is this distinguishable from gambling, and are daily fantasy sites liable to the same laws as casinos such as the Illinois Loss Recovery Act?
Turns out, they are not. On Oct. 9, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois ruled in favor of the FanDuel following a lawsuit claiming the company's daily fantasy games were illegal games of chance.
The court ruled in FanDuel's favor on mainly two accounts. First, the court ruled that plaintiff Christopher Langone “failed to make even a bare assertion that he could recover more than $75,000,” the minimum to bring legislation under the Illinois Loss Recovery Act. Second, the court claimed that FanDuel was not a “winner” based on the Act, but rather the operator of an online gambling site, similar to a 2007 ruling in favor of CBS concerning CBS Sports's full-season fantasy games.
According to Forbes contributor Marc Edelman, the court skirted around the key question of whether daily fantasy sports contests are illegal games of chance. This is important to legal counsel because it opens up the possibility for lawsuits on different grounds, especially from a plaintiff who reaches the $75,000 threshold.
Many smaller sites such as FanDuel, StarStreet, Draft Kings and others run daily fantasy games, but larger fantasy sports giants such as ESPN and NFL.com are starting to get into the daily fantasy game as well. By not answering the key question at hand, the district court opened these companies up to potential litigation down the road. Another suit, filed by Langone, against the daily fantasy site DraftDay is ongoing in Illinois courts, and Edelman speculates that suit may have a better chance of success.
Through his lawyer, Langone said he plans to pursue the FanDuel case. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet commented on whether it will pick up the case.
At this point, even if most people don't play fantasy sports, they at least know what it is: You pick a team for the entire season based on real-life players, you make trades within your league, and you get made fun of by your peers if you finish in last place. It's that simple.
However, daily fantasy sports are slightly different. You only select a team for a given day, and often, you pay an entry fee to compete against others for a daily grand prize. For many websites such as FanDuel.com, daily fantasy games are the lifeblood of their company.
But recently, a U.S. district court answered a very important question: How is this distinguishable from gambling, and are daily fantasy sites liable to the same laws as casinos such as the Illinois Loss Recovery Act?
Turns out, they are not. On Oct. 9, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois ruled in favor of the FanDuel following a lawsuit claiming the company's daily fantasy games were illegal games of chance.
The court ruled in FanDuel's favor on mainly two accounts. First, the court ruled that plaintiff Christopher Langone “failed to make even a bare assertion that he could recover more than $75,000,” the minimum to bring legislation under the Illinois Loss Recovery Act. Second, the court claimed that FanDuel was not a “winner” based on the Act, but rather the operator of an online gambling site, similar to a 2007 ruling in favor of CBS concerning CBS Sports's full-season fantasy games.
According to Forbes contributor Marc
Many smaller sites such as FanDuel, StarStreet, Draft Kings and others run daily fantasy games, but larger fantasy sports giants such as ESPN and NFL.com are starting to get into the daily fantasy game as well. By not answering the key question at hand, the district court opened these companies up to potential litigation down the road. Another suit, filed by Langone, against the daily fantasy site DraftDay is ongoing in Illinois courts, and
Through his lawyer, Langone said he plans to pursue the FanDuel case. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet commented on whether it will pick up the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
