Patent reform gets support from hospitality, retail spaces
The clearest sign that businesses in the retail, hospitality and other spaces are concerned with patent law came in a letter to Congress.
October 28, 2013 at 07:48 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Every industry has its share of specific problems. Major League Baseball deals with steroids, the entertainment industry must combat pirates, and the post office has to deal with an image problem. But sometimes there are concerns that sweep across multiple industries, and that is when America begins to take note. Gas prices, for example, have a huge impact on the cost of everything from shipping a package to buying groceries.
And now, it seems, problems with patent laws are beginning to touch just about every industry out there. Long gone are the days when supermarket and restaurant owners could read about the problems that tech companies were having with patent trolls and smile because it wasn't their problem. The fact of the matter is, the current state of the patent system in this country is having a profound impact on all facets of the economy, and business owners have decided to voice their concerns.
The clearest sign that businesses in the retail, hospitality and other spaces are concerned with patent law came in a letter to Congress. The letter, which was also signed by high-tech lobbying groups that have been active on the issue of patent reform for a while, included support from supermarkets, restaurants, airlines, printers and casinos.
The letter had some specific demands for Congress, asking them to expand the covered business method program, allowing for faster decisions on patent challenges brought to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Some large high-tech companies fear the expansion of the CBM program, believing that it would hamper their ability to enforce the rights of their own legitimate patents.
But, the letter argues, “companies need an effective alternative for challenging validity [of patents] outside of the courtroom.” It further praises the CBM, stating that the program “gives threatened companies a substantially less expensive way to challenge low quality patents. Other programs for challenging patent validity at the PTO do not allow the PTO to consider whether the patent is abstract, vague, or too broad.”
Now that frivolous lawsuits are trickling downstream, targeting businesses like hotels, casinos and supermarkets, the swell of support for patent reform has grown. Whether the solution lies in CBM expansion or other proposed reforms to the patent system remains to be seen, but it seems as if we have reached a tipping point on this issue, as it has gone beyond a niche problem to be a real concern for businesses in all industries. That, at least, should cause Congress to take notice – and perhaps action.
Congress introduces new bipartisan bill to combat patent trolls
Justification for post-grant procedures continues to mount
IP: Implications of GAO Report on patent infringement litigation
IP: Unintended consequences when licensing patented technology
Every industry has its share of specific problems. Major League Baseball deals with steroids, the entertainment industry must combat pirates, and the post office has to deal with an image problem. But sometimes there are concerns that sweep across multiple industries, and that is when America begins to take note. Gas prices, for example, have a huge impact on the cost of everything from shipping a package to buying groceries.
And now, it seems, problems with patent laws are beginning to touch just about every industry out there. Long gone are the days when supermarket and restaurant owners could read about the problems that tech companies were having with patent trolls and smile because it wasn't their problem. The fact of the matter is, the current state of the patent system in this country is having a profound impact on all facets of the economy, and business owners have decided to voice their concerns.
The clearest sign that businesses in the retail, hospitality and other spaces are concerned with patent law came in a letter to Congress. The letter, which was also signed by high-tech lobbying groups that have been active on the issue of patent reform for a while, included support from supermarkets, restaurants, airlines, printers and casinos.
The letter had some specific demands for Congress, asking them to expand the covered business method program, allowing for faster decisions on patent challenges brought to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Some large high-tech companies fear the expansion of the CBM program, believing that it would hamper their ability to enforce the rights of their own legitimate patents.
But, the letter argues, “companies need an effective alternative for challenging validity [of patents] outside of the courtroom.” It further praises the CBM, stating that the program “gives threatened companies a substantially less expensive way to challenge low quality patents. Other programs for challenging patent validity at the PTO do not allow the PTO to consider whether the patent is abstract, vague, or too broad.”
Now that frivolous lawsuits are trickling downstream, targeting businesses like hotels, casinos and supermarkets, the swell of support for patent reform has grown. Whether the solution lies in CBM expansion or other proposed reforms to the patent system remains to be seen, but it seems as if we have reached a tipping point on this issue, as it has gone beyond a niche problem to be a real concern for businesses in all industries. That, at least, should cause Congress to take notice – and perhaps action.
Congress introduces new bipartisan bill to combat patent trolls
Justification for post-grant procedures continues to mount
IP: Implications of GAO Report on patent infringement litigation
IP: Unintended consequences when licensing patented technology
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250