7 worst practices GCs should avoid
If you're a new general counsel, you can learn a lot about avoiding worst practices from seasoned GCs and board members.
October 31, 2013 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
If you're a new general counsel, you can learn a lot about avoiding worst practices from seasoned GCs and board members. This month's column may help new GCs accelerate that learning while reducing the pain. Errors come in the form of strategic bad judgment or tactical misses in the throes of drinking from a fire hose.
Failing to pay attention to relationships as well as your legal responsibilities to the company can cause serious issues. Strong relationships with those who interface with the board are key. In addition to the CEO, consider the CRO (chief risk officer), the CFO, the ethics officer, and the heads of human resources and internal audit, and perhaps some business unit leaders as well. This group is the GC's “magic circle.” Getting context, advice, the benefit of the experience from, and collaborating with, this magic circle, according to experts, is essential to the new GC successfully navigating mine fields and pitfalls.
Here are seven worst practices that you'll surely want to avoid:
-
Fail to learn about the board members' relationship with the CEO. Before entering the boardroom, learn as much as you can about each board member and his or her relationships with the CEO. Of course, first get the CEO's take on each board member.
-
Second-guess the CEO in front of the board. A GC can easily err by giving an opinion to the board without first knowing whether or how the CEO weighed in on that matter. Be sure to know the CEO's position.
-
Communicate with the board without the CEO's OK. Given that the GC has a fiduciary duty to the board, the GC will have to communicate with directors. But not getting a blanket buy-in from the CEO up front could lead to tension or worse down the road.
-
Fail to maintain board confidentiality with the executive team. The GC's fiduciary duty to the board requires the GC to maintain the confidentiality of executive sessions in which the GC participates. When pushed by the CEO to reveal information from an executive session, the GC can get caught in the middle. Stand your ground, but do it respectfully.
-
Not understand what is important to board members. Board members often are rightly concerned about liability and their reputations. They don't like surprises. Do they expect the GC to participate actively in meetings? What communication should be oral and what should be written? How should important communications be sequenced among and between board members? Meet with each board member and ask about his or her expectations.
-
Not do your homework. One GC shared that as a new GC, she was asked to provide audit committee minutes to the external auditors. She did so, but inadvertently included executive session minutes, which were not to be shared. The minutes documented inquiries regarding changing auditors. The external auditors called the audit chair to discuss the issue. The audit chair was furious with the GC. Had the GC reviewed the minutes more carefully, she could have saved herself a big headache.
-
Focus on the legal work rather than the relationships. Build relationships with people who understand or are influential with the board before those relationships are tapped. When a GC joins the company, fixating on legal issues could distract the GC from building relationships with those who have a larger view of the enterprise. These are the people who likely have been in the boardroom. Positive relationships with them are critical to your success.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250