Fostering mentoring relationships, from top general counsel
Top legal officers from of Hill-Rom, Girl Scouts of Chicago and Northwest Indiana, and Ingersoll Rand Industrial Technologies discusses mentor relationships in the legal realm.
October 31, 2013 at 04:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The mentoring topic is inspired by the Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) conference held in Washington D.C. by InsideCounsel earlier this month. A recurring theme emerged from the leadership track sessions. Essentially, no one succeeds alone, and you should seek out mentors and personal advisors throughout your career.
While a general counsel might serve as an internal sponsor to help a protégé gain executive level acceptance — and we will address sponsorship in a future column — mentoring relationships come in many varieties, usually outside the boss/employee structure. Recognizing that healthy mentoring relationships serve companies well, what role can a general counsel play to foster this behavior?
In the spirit of WIPL, I posed that question to three female general counsel with whom I have networked at various in-house counsel functions this year. These are individuals who value relationship building and enjoy discussing best practices. Susan Lichtenstein is general counsel of Hill-Rom; she kindly participated on a roundtable for InsideCounsel on building great teams while general counsel of Baxter International. Kathryn Mlsna is chief legal officer with Girl Scouts of Chicago and Northwest Indiana after holding senior level legal positions with McDonalds. And I'm just getting to know the dynamic Michelle Trumpower, general counsel of Ingersoll Rand Industrial Technologies, who I met at WIPL.
Susan, Kathryn and Michelle all pointed out that mentoring relationships should not be structured or forced by a general counsel. “Successful mentorships evolve organically,” was said by both Susan and Michelle. Michelle adds, “It is our responsibility to create opportunities for that to happen and to provide a support system for those to be successful.”
How? Susan states, “I try to create ample opportunity for informal social interaction so that these kinds of relationships have room to develop. I also encourage more junior people to ask for guidance; I tell them that no one has ever been anything but flattered by such a request.”
Kathryn emphasizes that the mentee must take ownership of the mentoring relationship, but states that “the chief legal officer can impact the individual and the organization in important ways.” When the mentor and mentee both happen to be lawyers within the same law department, Kathryn says it's imperative for the parties to define the relationship. “Is the attorney looking for a mentor – someone to serve as a sounding board and offer objective advice – or is she seeking a sponsor – someone who will invite her to the right meetings, introduce her to key organizational stakeholders, and recommend her for recognition?”
Although organic mentoring relationships yield the kind of confidentiality and trust that our contributors recognize as most helpful, those relationships can emerge as a by-product of formal leadership or best practices programs. Ingersoll-Rand, for example, is rolling out an enterprise-wide “5 Centers of Excellence” initiative that will, in part, provide staff attorneys with new global connections within the company. “I truly believe we will see some informal mentorships develop during this process,” Michelle predicts.
This may be stretching the word mentor a bit, but I cannot conclude before mentioning a terrific structured reverse mentoring program at Girl Scouts. Each board member is paired with a scout, so that the younger “mentor” can keep her board member current on changes in the world of being a girl scout today. While light years away from LawWorld, it's a cool way to make the point that mentoring relationships always enrich the lives of both parties.
Everyone recognizes the positive value of mentoring, so the simple advice for law department leaders is to please encourage the behavior. Create an environment of trust that is conducive to mentoring internally. And sending your attorneys to networking events, like WIPL, is a great way to help them start mentoring relationships externally.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Monmouth Couty Bench May Soon Have a New Superior Court Judge
- 2Fate of Ethics Panel—and Cuomo Book Deal Probe—Is in Top Court's Hands as January Arguments Approach
- 3How a Second Trump Presidency Could Shape IP
- 4Pa. Firms Set to Finish Year Strong, Thanks to Demand Uptick, Shorter Collections Cycle
- 5It's Not About You: Lessons of the Mock Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250