Why connecting is important for inside counsel
Technology is here to stay. I get that. However, we dont have to be enslaved by it.
October 31, 2013 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
I graduated from law school in 1981. Although we didn't have email, fax machines or the Internet, we did have robust and meaningful conversations about ideas and projects that we were passionate about. We spent more talking (and debating) and created a connection amongst the two or three different groups that were important to us.
Everybody agrees that the advent of technology has compressed the time for decision-making and invaded our personal space in ways that were unthinkable 20 years ago. However, the biggest loss has been the fact that we seem to have lost the opportunity to stay connected to ideas, people and groups that contribute to our sense of self. When was the last time that you have a conversation that ended on terms of your own choosing (instead of being interrupted by an email or some type of special alert on your smartphone)?
Technology is here to stay. I get that. However, we don't have to be enslaved by it.
This is the first issue of the redesign of InsideCounsel magazine. Before we decided on the graphics and the architecture of the magazine, we had to answer a fundamental question, “What is the experience that we want to create for our readers?” My answer: “Five cool rooms, 15 cool people.” More specifically, we want the magazine to capture the kinds of ideas that inspire you to engage your peers in meaningful (and even fun) conversations. More importantly, you will find that the ideas that are captured in the magazine will pour over into our website, our regional workshops and our national conferences.
In the last six months, we have talked with 20 members of publicly traded boards, eight CFOs of Fortune 500 companies and eight external auditors of those companies. The question that we asked them is, what are the tensions and conflicts in the boardroom that are most difficult for the general counsel? Their responses have been clear and resounding: 1) that the most effective general counsel adroitly balance their fiduciary responsibilities to the CEO and senior management by engaging each board member to ascertain their specific informational needs; and 2) they told us that general counsel need to do a better job developing their successors.
Heidi Miller, former president of J.P. Morgan and a current member of the board of directors of General Mills, framed the challenge perfectly when she stated, “any lawyer can help discern between a violation that may be jay walking or murder. My ideal general counsel will be invited to product development meetings to guide the conversation from the inception until the time that we go the marketplace. It is very easy for a general counsel to say that my lawyers are business partners to their clients.” The question for general counsel is: what resources are you devoting to their professional development and training?
Consequently, we intend to drive that conversation by convening an advisory group to develop curriculum for deputy general counsel. In addition, we will pilot the effectiveness of that curriculum at the Mary Ann Hynes Leadership Institute that will be held in Dallas (March 11-12, 2014). Finally, we will launch a series of regional one-day symposiums that will focus on “Financial Acumen for Lawyers.”
Over the last 20 years, I have had 400-plus conversations with more than 250 general counsel in Fortune 500 companies. Erin Harrison, InsideCounsel's newly minted editor-in-chief, and the IC editorial team have conversations with in-house counsel on a daily basis. This magazine was redesigned to engage you in those conversations. The conversations start with the magazine and will be supplemented by webinars and face-to-face events such as SuperConference.
We want to start the conversation. If you want to join, email me [email protected] or call (312) 846-4607 and by all means connect.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250