General counsel advice on increasing your boardroom presence
Three leading general counsel provide advice that junior to mid-level inside counsel can use to build their boardroom presence, an essential quality companies seek when making a senior level hire.
December 10, 2013 at 03:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Let's first define what we mean by boardroom presence, as this is an essential quality companies seek when making a senior level hire. We are talking about business maturity, confidence, presentation ability, and interpersonal skills.
I asked three leading general counsel for advice that junior to mid-level inside counsel can use to build their board room presence. My thanks go to Christine Castellano of Ingredion, Carrie Hightman of NiSource and Jim Rogers of Orbitz.
Christine and Jim encourage you to help with board meetings as a starting point. “Volunteer to take notes at a board meeting,” Jim suggests. “Even if you do not get to present before the board, offer to help prepare governance documents or other items which will be presented to the board,” Christine says.
Long before you get your first opportunity to present to the board, hone your skills outside the boardroom. Presentations to senior management are ideal preparation, but some readers might benefit from extracurricular practice via toastmasters clubs and similar small group public speaking formats. “Ask for feedback from individuals you trust, but who will give you an honest opinion,” Christine suggests. “Did you appear confident, poised, and knowledgeable or did you appear unsure, nervous or arrogant?”
Once you get your opportunity, Carrie points out the important nuanced difference between presentations to management and board level interaction. “Critical to being effective as counsel in the board room is knowing when to speak up and when to defer to the CEO and board.” Carrie adds, “You need to understand what the CEO expects and what he or she is trying to accomplish in order to optimize your participation in the board meeting and to be invited back.”
The ability to remain concise in the boardroom is critical, according to Carrie and Jim. “The board is looking for broad strokes,” Jim says, “speak concisely and clearly. Insecurity manifests itself in providing too much detail (on a legal issue) and lacking decisiveness. Confidence and conciseness go hand in glove.” Carrie explains, “You need to understand that perfect is the enemy of the good. It isn't important to state or restate every legal principle so long as the principle is generally understood by the board.”
Of course, you will be thoroughly prepared to answer questions. Speaking of preparation, Christine reminds you to “make sure you know the board members' biographies before you meet them. Be able to address them by name, and know on which board committees they sit.”
While preparation is a given and will help your confidence level, some of you will still be nervous your first few times in the room. None of our experts volunteered the “picture everyone naked” advice, although you may contact me for tips on fighting stage fright generally if that's a real concern for you. Jim reminds us, “Board members are just people.” So, find that balance between speaking comfortably on the one hand while, as Jim puts it, “resisting the desire to show off your knowledge” on the other.
Let's first define what we mean by boardroom presence, as this is an essential quality companies seek when making a senior level hire. We are talking about business maturity, confidence, presentation ability, and interpersonal skills.
I asked three leading general counsel for advice that junior to mid-level inside counsel can use to build their board room presence. My thanks go to Christine Castellano of Ingredion, Carrie Hightman of NiSource and Jim Rogers of Orbitz.
Christine and Jim encourage you to help with board meetings as a starting point. “Volunteer to take notes at a board meeting,” Jim suggests. “Even if you do not get to present before the board, offer to help prepare governance documents or other items which will be presented to the board,” Christine says.
Long before you get your first opportunity to present to the board, hone your skills outside the boardroom. Presentations to senior management are ideal preparation, but some readers might benefit from extracurricular practice via toastmasters clubs and similar small group public speaking formats. “Ask for feedback from individuals you trust, but who will give you an honest opinion,” Christine suggests. “Did you appear confident, poised, and knowledgeable or did you appear unsure, nervous or arrogant?”
Once you get your opportunity, Carrie points out the important nuanced difference between presentations to management and board level interaction. “Critical to being effective as counsel in the board room is knowing when to speak up and when to defer to the CEO and board.” Carrie adds, “You need to understand what the CEO expects and what he or she is trying to accomplish in order to optimize your participation in the board meeting and to be invited back.”
The ability to remain concise in the boardroom is critical, according to Carrie and Jim. “The board is looking for broad strokes,” Jim says, “speak concisely and clearly. Insecurity manifests itself in providing too much detail (on a legal issue) and lacking decisiveness. Confidence and conciseness go hand in glove.” Carrie explains, “You need to understand that perfect is the enemy of the good. It isn't important to state or restate every legal principle so long as the principle is generally understood by the board.”
Of course, you will be thoroughly prepared to answer questions. Speaking of preparation, Christine reminds you to “make sure you know the board members' biographies before you meet them. Be able to address them by name, and know on which board committees they sit.”
While preparation is a given and will help your confidence level, some of you will still be nervous your first few times in the room. None of our experts volunteered the “picture everyone naked” advice, although you may contact me for tips on fighting stage fright generally if that's a real concern for you. Jim reminds us, “Board members are just people.” So, find that balance between speaking comfortably on the one hand while, as Jim puts it, “resisting the desire to show off your knowledge” on the other.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Monmouth Couty Bench May Soon Have a New Superior Court Judge
- 2Fate of Ethics Panel—and Cuomo Book Deal Probe—Is in Top Court's Hands as January Arguments Approach
- 3How a Second Trump Presidency Could Shape IP
- 4Pa. Firms Set to Finish Year Strong, Thanks to Demand Uptick, Shorter Collections Cycle
- 5It's Not About You: Lessons of the Mock Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250