iPhone supplier Foxconn misses labor targets
Foxconn Technology Group has not complied with Chinese labor law by allowing factory workers to exceed limits on hours even as the company met most conditions set out by a monitoring group.
December 13, 2013 at 06:48 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Technology giant Apple has been under fire in recent years for its labor practices in facilities around the world. In early 2012, The New York Times published a Pulitzer Prize winning series of reports that exposed poor working conditions in factories that made Apple products.
The reports focused on iPad manufacturing in China, describing harsh labor conditions, safety concerns and difficult work environments. Living conditions, overtime demands and other egregious workplace red flags, like underage workers and falsified records, were documented as well. The report did a lot to bruise the reputation of Apple. The tech giant is now taking steps to improve its track record.
It had been reported recently that Apple supplier Foxconn Technology Group has not complied with Chinese labor law by allowing factory workers to exceed limits on hours even as the company met 99 percent of conditions set out by a monitoring group. After inspecting assembly lines for 15 months after releasing its final audit in March 2012, the Fair Labor Association observed that restrictions on overtime were broken because labor shortages and employee turnover forced staff to work longer hours.
After a spate of suicides in 2011, last year Apple joined the FLA, leading to inspections at three of Foxconn's factories in a bid to improve conditions and identify remedial items. Founder Terry Gou raised salaries, hired counselors and increased social activities for the company's one million workers.
“Because of Foxconn's weight in the labor market, anything they do tends to have a market-setting aspect to it,” Auret van Heerden, president of the Washington-based labor group, said in a statement. “The government's limit of 49 hours a week was always a very ambitious goal. They made phenomenal progress in getting to an average of about 52, 53 hours a week.”
During the first audit last year, the FLA found 50 breaches of Chinese regulations and the code of conduct. At the time, Taipei-based Foxconn failed to meet work-hour limits, had inconsistent health and safety policies, and issued unfair overtime pay. In its final report last month, Foxconn was found to comply with 356 of 360 action items, or about 99 percent, with the four remaining issues related to work hours.
“The results of that report demonstrate substantial overall progress by our company in carrying out the 15-month remedial program in many areas,” Foxconn said in a statement. “We recognize that there is more to be done, and that we must continue to sustain this progress.”
Apple CEO Tim Cook has made improving conditions and says the company will suspend business with those that violate its code of conduct. While all workers building iPads and iMacs at the company's Longhua plant in Shenzhen worked less than 60 hours a week, about 68 percent exceeded the monthly cap of 36 overtime hours. At the Guanlan facility in Shenzhen, where Foxconn assembles iPhones, one third of workers surpassed the 60-hour weekly limit as Apple prepared to release new products. Overall, more than half exceeded the monthly overtime mandate.
According to Apple, working hours have come down because of its attention to the issue, and the company will continue providing monthly reports on compliance. “We are proud of the progress we have made together with the FLA and Foxconn,” Apple said in an e-mailed statement. “We are committed to reducing excessive overtime even further.”
Apple states on its website, “Workers everywhere should have the right to safe and ethical working conditions. They should also have access to educational opportunities to improve their lives. Through a continual cycle of inspections, improvement plans, and verification, we work with our suppliers to make sure they comply with our Code of Conduct and live up to these ideals.”
The recommended remedies include closer monitoring of work hours on a weekly basis, revising policies and procedures, and better forecasting and production planning.
For more on compliance, check out the following stories:
Technology giant Apple has been under fire in recent years for its labor practices in facilities around the world. In early 2012, The
The reports focused on iPad manufacturing in China, describing harsh labor conditions, safety concerns and difficult work environments. Living conditions, overtime demands and other egregious workplace red flags, like underage workers and falsified records, were documented as well. The report did a lot to bruise the reputation of
It had been reported recently that
After a spate of suicides in 2011, last year
“Because of Foxconn's weight in the labor market, anything they do tends to have a market-setting aspect to it,” Auret van Heerden, president of the Washington-based labor group, said in a statement. “The government's limit of 49 hours a week was always a very ambitious goal. They made phenomenal progress in getting to an average of about 52, 53 hours a week.”
During the first audit last year, the FLA found 50 breaches of Chinese regulations and the code of conduct. At the time, Taipei-based Foxconn failed to meet work-hour limits, had inconsistent health and safety policies, and issued unfair overtime pay. In its final report last month, Foxconn was found to comply with 356 of 360 action items, or about 99 percent, with the four remaining issues related to work hours.
“The results of that report demonstrate substantial overall progress by our company in carrying out the 15-month remedial program in many areas,” Foxconn said in a statement. “We recognize that there is more to be done, and that we must continue to sustain this progress.”
According to
The recommended remedies include closer monitoring of work hours on a weekly basis, revising policies and procedures, and better forecasting and production planning.
For more on compliance, check out the following stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250