Patents in Canadian energy abound
As the market for energy patents increases, the Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance has its work cut out for it.
December 17, 2013 at 04:25 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Patent laws span every industry and market, and as new inventions mark the advancements in certain types of technology, the competition for patents in specific fields becomes all the more aggressive. The Canadian energy industry is no exception. Reports note that hundreds of patents exist for varying companies within the energy field of the largest country in North America. And as the market for energy patents increases, the Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA) has its work cut out for it.
The 13 members of the oil sands producers collaborate to preserve developments and technological advancements for the production of oil with 560 technologies to date. With such a burgeoning industry — particularly as global concern for the environmental impact of oil increases as climate talks and international groups focus on bettering the greener developments of energy resources — COSIA faces legal challenges creating agreements that do not infringe on intellectual properties.
Despite the escalation of inventive energy technologies, and the resourcefulness of engineers to improve energy production and consumption across Canada — as with any legal process — patents take forever. And as the energy industry is at the forefront of global environmental concern, a general question becomes: Why not make more green energy patents available to more companies? If the patent is for the efficiency and increased health of the general public, why perpetuate the yearlong mandates for putting patents through and securing their ownership for two decades? Herein lies the question of the value of invention — one that will likely be an oft-debated legal subject for the foreseeable future.
Further reading:
Canadian law complicates potential BlackBerry sale
More Canadian women 'Breaking Through' as general counsel
Canada Supreme Court strikes down Pfizer's Viagra patent
Patent laws span every industry and market, and as new inventions mark the advancements in certain types of technology, the competition for patents in specific fields becomes all the more aggressive. The Canadian energy industry is no exception. Reports note that hundreds of patents exist for varying companies within the energy field of the largest country in North America. And as the market for energy patents increases, the Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA) has its work cut out for it.
The 13 members of the oil sands producers collaborate to preserve developments and technological advancements for the production of oil with 560 technologies to date. With such a burgeoning industry — particularly as global concern for the environmental impact of oil increases as climate talks and international groups focus on bettering the greener developments of energy resources — COSIA faces legal challenges creating agreements that do not infringe on intellectual properties.
Despite the escalation of inventive energy technologies, and the resourcefulness of engineers to improve energy production and consumption across Canada — as with any legal process — patents take forever. And as the energy industry is at the forefront of global environmental concern, a general question becomes: Why not make more green energy patents available to more companies? If the patent is for the efficiency and increased health of the general public, why perpetuate the yearlong mandates for putting patents through and securing their ownership for two decades? Herein lies the question of the value of invention — one that will likely be an oft-debated legal subject for the foreseeable future.
Further reading:
Canadian law complicates potential BlackBerry sale
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250