The NAI and IPO name top 100 worldwide universities granted U.S. patents
The National Academy of Inventors and the Intellectual Property Owners Association have unveiled the Top 100 Worldwide Universities granted U.S. patents in 2012.
December 23, 2013 at 04:15 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In their 30th year in a row of recognizing the role patents play in university research, the National Academy of Inventors (NAI) and the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) have unveiled the Top 100 Worldwide Universities granted U.S. patents in 2012.
“Innovation based on university technology has proven to be a key factor in worldwide industrial and economic development. In the 21st century, the support, encouragement and development of technology and innovation are fundamental to the success of a university,” Paul R. Sanberg, president of the NAI, said in a statement.
Growing rapidly, the NAI is a non-profit member organization made up of more than 3,000 inventor members and fellows spanning over 200 universities across the globe and governmental and non-profit research institutions. It was founded in 2010 to recognize inventors with U.S. patents, enhance the visibility of academic innovation, encourage the disclosure of intellectual property, educate students and enable its members' inventions to benefit society.
The IPO is a trade association for owners of patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. It advocates for affordable IP ownership rights and provides services to members, including supporting member interests of legislative issues; analyzing IP issues; educational services; and communicating with the general public about intellectual property rights.
Together, the two organizations compiled the list by calculating the number of utility patents granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office during 2012, which list a university as the first assignee on the patent.
“Patents encourage innovation and can promote industrial research funding and commercialization by providing corporations the incentive to invest in university research projects,” said IPO Executive Director Herbert C. Wamsley. ”The commercialization of these innovations transfers cutting-edge research to the commercial marketplace, generating revenue and diversifying the economy.”
Since the enactment in 1980 of the U.S. legislation, Bayh-Dole Act, the number of patents held by universities in the U.S. has increased, which has led to more licensing income for inventors, better funding opportunities because of wider research collaborations and an entrepreneurial culture.
“University inventors are the discoverers and creators of new solutions to existing problems, and, as such, are key contributors to the advancement of technology,” said Sanberg. “Protection of this intellectual property, through the patenting process, underpins the creation of new industries and employment.”
For more on intellectual property patents, check out the following articles:
In their 30th year in a row of recognizing the role patents play in university research, the National Academy of Inventors (NAI) and the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) have unveiled the Top 100 Worldwide Universities granted U.S. patents in 2012.
“Innovation based on university technology has proven to be a key factor in worldwide industrial and economic development. In the 21st century, the support, encouragement and development of technology and innovation are fundamental to the success of a university,” Paul R. Sanberg, president of the NAI, said in a statement.
Growing rapidly, the NAI is a non-profit member organization made up of more than 3,000 inventor members and fellows spanning over 200 universities across the globe and governmental and non-profit research institutions. It was founded in 2010 to recognize inventors with U.S. patents, enhance the visibility of academic innovation, encourage the disclosure of intellectual property, educate students and enable its members' inventions to benefit society.
The IPO is a trade association for owners of patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. It advocates for affordable IP ownership rights and provides services to members, including supporting member interests of legislative issues; analyzing IP issues; educational services; and communicating with the general public about intellectual property rights.
Together, the two organizations compiled the list by calculating the number of utility patents granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office during 2012, which list a university as the first assignee on the patent.
“Patents encourage innovation and can promote industrial research funding and commercialization by providing corporations the incentive to invest in university research projects,” said IPO Executive Director Herbert C. Wamsley. ”The commercialization of these innovations transfers cutting-edge research to the commercial marketplace, generating revenue and diversifying the economy.”
Since the enactment in 1980 of the U.S. legislation, Bayh-Dole Act, the number of patents held by universities in the U.S. has increased, which has led to more licensing income for inventors, better funding opportunities because of wider research collaborations and an entrepreneurial culture.
“University inventors are the discoverers and creators of new solutions to existing problems, and, as such, are key contributors to the advancement of technology,” said Sanberg. “Protection of this intellectual property, through the patenting process, underpins the creation of new industries and employment.”
For more on intellectual property patents, check out the following articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250