Hollywood wants international treaty to toughen copyright laws
Illegal downloads and bootleg sales continues to be bad for business for Tinseltown, and the powers-that-be in Hollywood are getting tough and is lobbying for strong intellectual property laws to be adopted in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
December 27, 2013 at 08:22 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Illegal downloads and bootleg sales continues to be bad for business for Tinseltown, and the powers-that-be in Hollywood are getting tough and is lobbying for strong intellectual property laws to be adopted in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Marketplace.org reports that Anissa Brennan, vice president for International Affairs and Trade Policy at the Motion Picture Association of America, is calling for the treaty to follow U.S. law, which doesn't allow movie goers to film what's on the screen, then sell illegal copies.
She explains in a recent article on marketplace.org, “If you go into a theater and you record a film without the permission of the theater owner, it's a criminal act.” She is also calling for the trade deal to extend copyrights to the life of the author plus 70 years.
The treaty, according to the Washington Post's technology blog, 'Switch,' is a trade accord that will ease the flow of goods and services among the United States, Canada, Chile, Japan, New Zealand, Malaysia, and other nations along the Pacific Rim. But it has attracted criticism for its secrecy, and for the inclusion of controversial provisions related to copyright, patent, and trademark protections.
Back in November, WikiLeaks revealed provisions of the treaty while the 'ultra-secret' negotiations between partner countries were occurring. When the draft was leaked, the Motion Picture Association of America reacted favorably to the United States's role in talks, saying that it 'put forth no proposals that are inconsistent with U.S. law.'
“The United States has the most dynamic creative and technology sectors in the world, and an open and free Internet. The TPP proposals attributed to the U.S. would build upon that tremendous foundation.”To the extent that other countries are unwilling to take on these obligations, it threatens the viability of the agreement,” Michael O'Leary, Senior Executive Vice President for Global Policy and External Affairs for the Motion Picture Association Inc.
Bill Watson, a trade policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, is an advocate of free trade. He told marketplace.org that U.S. negotiators have taken Hollywood's position, which isn't very popular. “
To the extent that other countries are unwilling to take on these obligations, it threatens the viability of the agreement,” he says.
Watson doesn't think the movie protections the U.S. is pushing for will derail the trade negotiations. But he says it's putting stress on a very fragile deal.
Illegal downloads and bootleg sales continues to be bad for business for Tinseltown, and the powers-that-be in Hollywood are getting tough and is lobbying for strong intellectual property laws to be adopted in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Marketplace.org reports that Anissa Brennan, vice president for International Affairs and Trade Policy at the Motion Picture Association of America, is calling for the treaty to follow U.S. law, which doesn't allow movie goers to film what's on the screen, then sell illegal copies.
She explains in a recent article on marketplace.org, “If you go into a theater and you record a film without the permission of the theater owner, it's a criminal act.” She is also calling for the trade deal to extend copyrights to the life of the author plus 70 years.
The treaty, according to the
Back in November, WikiLeaks revealed provisions of the treaty while the 'ultra-secret' negotiations between partner countries were occurring. When the draft was leaked, the Motion Picture Association of America reacted favorably to the United States's role in talks, saying that it 'put forth no proposals that are inconsistent with U.S. law.'
“The United States has the most dynamic creative and technology sectors in the world, and an open and free Internet. The TPP proposals attributed to the U.S. would build upon that tremendous foundation.”To the extent that other countries are unwilling to take on these obligations, it threatens the viability of the agreement,” Michael O'Leary, Senior Executive Vice President for Global Policy and External Affairs for the Motion Picture Association Inc.
Bill Watson, a trade policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, is an advocate of free trade. He told marketplace.org that U.S. negotiators have taken Hollywood's position, which isn't very popular. “
To the extent that other countries are unwilling to take on these obligations, it threatens the viability of the agreement,” he says.
Watson doesn't think the movie protections the U.S. is pushing for will derail the trade negotiations. But he says it's putting stress on a very fragile deal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKhan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Trending Stories
- 1Commonwealth Court Overturns Award of Damages Assessed Against Landlord on Claims of Unlawful Discrimination
- 2NY Top Court to Decide Whether County Governments Owe Special Duty to Foster Care Placements
- 3Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
- 4Some New Twists and Old Tricks for an Ethical New Year
- 5TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250