Considering joining a board? Read this first
Board service is like marriage: Its a great idea that can tragically turn into a nightmare if the wrong people are tied together for the wrong reasons.
December 31, 2013 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
Is it your New Year's resolution to focus (finally!) on joining a corporate board? After all, you are a seasoned in-house lawyer who has a ton of industry-relevant business experience. So it makes sense to get out there and network. If the stars align, an interesting board position will surface. Before accepting, take a moment to step back and ask some key questions. Board service is like marriage: It's a great idea that can tragically turn into a nightmare if the wrong people are tied together for the wrong reasons.
Before joining a board, you might consider three categories of questions: 1) management-board dynamics, 2) board processes, and 3) board protections.
When it comes to management-board dynamics, one key concern is the nature of the CEO's relationship to the board. Are the other board members all social friends of the CEO? Will you be the first truly independent board member to join? That's fine, but it can also be lonely and difficult. Does the board have a lot of confidence in management or is CEO-succession planning about to become an urgent priority? Finally, is there alignment between management's view and the board's view of the company culture, especially concerning ethical behavior? Understanding the frequency and outcome of whistleblower-type complaints can be a way to unpack this tricky issue. The same can be said for understanding management's view of the board's role when it comes to enterprise risk management, including what type of information is given to the board to support this role.
Board processes might seem straightforward, and they can be. On the other hand, woe be to the newbie board member who is the only person that realizes the way a particular board is operating falls far outside of normal practices. Even when a board agrees that governance is important, nothing will sideline a new board member faster than appearing to be overly concerned with processes at the expense of the business. Exploring the reasons for the current size of the board and set of skills represented on the board can be illuminating. Also, one of the most important responsibilities a board has is its own succession. Is your ascension to the board part of a master plan, or is the board adding members in an entirely opportunistic fashion? The latter can be just fine, although it might not be the best way to ensure that the board has the full set of skills it needs to be as effective as possible.
Finally, before agreeing to join the board, it's worth researching what board protections are in place. For example, has the company included exculpatory provisions for monetary liability in its charter where possible? Has it considered choice of forum provisions in its bylaws (or charter)? Also, what indemnification arrangements have been put in place? A company that is not offering a state-of-the-art personal indemnification agreement contract to all independent board members is a company that may be behind the times in other ways as well.
In addition, it's a good idea to ask about the company's D&O insurance program. There are circumstances in which even the most highly capitalized company cannot indemnify a director (ex. the settlement of derivative suits), and the only thing standing between a director and personal liability is a robust D&O insurance program.
On the other hand, an excessively large D&O insurance program may also be cause for concern. For example, an overly large insurance program can be a consequence of management's and the board's uneasiness about a specific, particularly difficult set of issues. If so, you'll want to understand these issues before you join the board.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
John Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
7 minute readAntitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250