Bill to help small businesses could be dead on arrival
H.R. 1105: Small Business Capital Access and Job Perseveration Act that aims to loosen excessive and unnecessary regulations when it comes to private enterprise and business seems to be indefinitely stalled.
January 06, 2014 at 04:28 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's been a hackneyed term of phrase from lawmakers in Washington, DC – create a friendly environment for start ups and small business and the private sector and economy will grow. However, the bill, H.R. 1105: “Small Business Capital Access and Job Perseveration Act” that aims to “loosen excessive and unnecessary” regulations when it comes to private enterprise and business seems to be indefinitely stalled.
The bill was introduced by Congressman Robert Hurt (R-Va.) last year in an attempt to quash private equity fund advisers from red-tape and costly Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements that ultimately seem to have ramifications on economic growth. Many are lamenting that the bill itself has been in limbo thanks to what they say is “political posturing.” The bill passed last month in the House, and has been referred to the Senate for more vetting and a vote. However, according to The Hill, the White House veto threat makes it likely that the Senate will not consider it either after the Christmas break.
According to The Hill, just before the final vote, the House rejected an amendment from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) that would have required private equity firms with U.S. assets worth anywhere from $150 million to $1 billion to register with the SEC, but also would have required the SEC to create a simpler registration process. That measure was defeated.
The regulation has its genesis in the Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act imposes more registration and reporting requirements to register with the SEC. As a result of Title IV's registration requirements, advisers to private funds must maintain records and file reports with the SEC, which are made available to other regulators, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). Requiring all advisers to private funds to maintain records and file reports with the SEC does little to improve the SEC's ability to meet its mission, while weighing it down with unnecessary tasks and stifling rather than promoting capital formation.
In short, critics of Dodd-Frank think the new regulations on private equity may be slowing the flow of capital to startups. According to smallbiztrends.com, opponents of the new bill like Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) say relaxing regulation, even on private equity firms, is a bad idea.
For more news on business regulation, check out the following:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKhan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Trending Stories
- 1Commonwealth Court Overturns Award of Damages Assessed Against Landlord on Claims of Unlawful Discrimination
- 2NY Top Court to Decide Whether County Governments Owe Special Duty to Foster Care Placements
- 3Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
- 4Some New Twists and Old Tricks for an Ethical New Year
- 5TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250