Blending compliance and procurement creates recipe for a successful business
In todays business environment, the procurement department, responsible for all of the purchasing activity of a company, has become somewhat of a support system for the compliance department.
January 07, 2014 at 04:27 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The New Year is the perfect time for an organization to reevaluate its position regarding compliance regulations. In order to run an effective business, decision-makers must ensure that their management and employees are adhering to the proper rules and latest standards year to year, especially as regulations change. So it is no surprise that reports of compliance tips and laws are surfacing this month, particularly as the biggest conference surrounding compliance, Compliance Week, is being promoted in anticipation of the upcoming event this Spring.
While compliance may not be top of mind for some administrators, it is an essential part of running an effective and compliant organization. In fact, in a recent Compliance Week report, Matt Kelly referenced an interesting metaphor, comparing the chief compliance officer to a primary care physician, responsible for the overall health of the compliance program, yet enlisting in other specialists in other parts of the business such as legal, accounting, IT, internal audit, human resources, etc. to help keep a company running properly.
In today's business environment, the procurement department, responsible for all of the purchasing activity of a company, has become somewhat of a support system for the compliance department. Considering how closely related each department is, regardless of the bottom line of a business, it makes perfect sense for the two departments to combine forces to create a stronger administrative system.
According to Kelly, if companies are smart, they will begin consolidating deal making into one central procurement department and let the gatekeepers make the decisions. The procurement department then has the power to pick and choose third parties based on cost, since that is their primary focus.
In addition, when reviewing and signing important contracts, enlisting in the help of the procurement office, who can assist in dissecting and drafting complicated legal jargon, can make a compliance officer's job easier and more efficient in the long run, given the expertise centralized procurement possesses.
If you are looking to streamline your processes for a more productive and profitable 2014, an easy place to start is by consolidating your legal and procurement departments. Marrying the two will not only help you to restructure your procedures, but may also unlock knowledge and solutions that have been under your nose all along.
For related articles on compliance and procurement, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
One size does not fit all when it comes to compliance strategies
Shareholder approval of golden parachutes tied to M&As swells in 2013
Technology: Contracting for cloud services, a roadmap for cloud users
The New Year is the perfect time for an organization to reevaluate its position regarding compliance regulations. In order to run an effective business, decision-makers must ensure that their management and employees are adhering to the proper rules and latest standards year to year, especially as regulations change. So it is no surprise that reports of compliance tips and laws are surfacing this month, particularly as the biggest conference surrounding compliance, Compliance Week, is being promoted in anticipation of the upcoming event this Spring.
While compliance may not be top of mind for some administrators, it is an essential part of running an effective and compliant organization. In fact, in a recent Compliance Week report, Matt Kelly referenced an interesting metaphor, comparing the chief compliance officer to a primary care physician, responsible for the overall health of the compliance program, yet enlisting in other specialists in other parts of the business such as legal, accounting, IT, internal audit, human resources, etc. to help keep a company running properly.
In today's business environment, the procurement department, responsible for all of the purchasing activity of a company, has become somewhat of a support system for the compliance department. Considering how closely related each department is, regardless of the bottom line of a business, it makes perfect sense for the two departments to combine forces to create a stronger administrative system.
According to Kelly, if companies are smart, they will begin consolidating deal making into one central procurement department and let the gatekeepers make the decisions. The procurement department then has the power to pick and choose third parties based on cost, since that is their primary focus.
In addition, when reviewing and signing important contracts, enlisting in the help of the procurement office, who can assist in dissecting and drafting complicated legal jargon, can make a compliance officer's job easier and more efficient in the long run, given the expertise centralized procurement possesses.
If you are looking to streamline your processes for a more productive and profitable 2014, an easy place to start is by consolidating your legal and procurement departments. Marrying the two will not only help you to restructure your procedures, but may also unlock knowledge and solutions that have been under your nose all along.
For related articles on compliance and procurement, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
One size does not fit all when it comes to compliance strategies
Shareholder approval of golden parachutes tied to M&As swells in 2013
Technology: Contracting for cloud services, a roadmap for cloud users
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250