Lower taxes + less regulation = a prosperous economy, says study
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years.
January 22, 2014 at 04:17 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years. Organizations such as the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation in Washington have been measuring countries that implement fiscal restraint to help improve the state of the economy for their citizens for over two decades.
According to a Daily Advance report, those countries that have adopted fiscal restraint and free trade are recognized by earning high scores on the index for protecting the rights of contract and property ownership while avoiding excessive taxes or regulations. Needless to say, countries that abuse their power and do not adhere to practices to help improve the state of their economy earn low scores.
In the past 20 years, global poverty has experienced one of the largest declines in history due to hundreds of millions of people who live in countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asian that have liberalized their economies. It is up to each country's government to put policies and processes in place to consistently maintain or improve their financial state, however, that is not always the case, particularly with the standard of living increasing due to escalating oil and natural resources costs.
For the countries that do not display acts of fiscal restraint or are up against hardships that prevent them from stabilizing their economies, they remain repressed and are experiencing lower scores on the index than ever. Unfortunately after enduring one of the biggest economic declines in U.S. history, the United States has fallen out of the top 10 countries in economic freedom, according to the index.
So what can the U.S. do to regain its independence towards economic freedom? It's up to the state and local government to take charge to help reverse the downward trend. The first step is to curb our country's fiscal recklessness and to stabilize regulatory burdens that result in tax increases. Next is for the government to begin breaking down economic freedom a step further by state since evidence proves that jobs and businesses created at the state level help to further support economic growth.
In the report, John Hood referenced a 2012 paper in the International Journal of Economics and Finance that stated that higher economic freedom tends to attract higher levels of investment from foreign firms, which then leads to more economic growth. In addition, a 2007 study in the Southern Economic Journal found that states attract another form of valuable capital, people, to the extent they embrace economic freedom.
For related news on financial regulation and tax reform, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
Regulation is top future risk for financial services
JPMorgan Chase finalizes deal with DOJ
Regulatory: Why the SEC's proposed pay-ratio rule will increase compliance costs
A recent study highlighting the international index of economic freedom states that the average amount of economic freedom is higher today than it has been in the past 20 years. Organizations such as the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation in Washington have been measuring countries that implement fiscal restraint to help improve the state of the economy for their citizens for over two decades.
According to a Daily Advance report, those countries that have adopted fiscal restraint and free trade are recognized by earning high scores on the index for protecting the rights of contract and property ownership while avoiding excessive taxes or regulations. Needless to say, countries that abuse their power and do not adhere to practices to help improve the state of their economy earn low scores.
In the past 20 years, global poverty has experienced one of the largest declines in history due to hundreds of millions of people who live in countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asian that have liberalized their economies. It is up to each country's government to put policies and processes in place to consistently maintain or improve their financial state, however, that is not always the case, particularly with the standard of living increasing due to escalating oil and natural resources costs.
For the countries that do not display acts of fiscal restraint or are up against hardships that prevent them from stabilizing their economies, they remain repressed and are experiencing lower scores on the index than ever. Unfortunately after enduring one of the biggest economic declines in U.S. history, the United States has fallen out of the top 10 countries in economic freedom, according to the index.
So what can the U.S. do to regain its independence towards economic freedom? It's up to the state and local government to take charge to help reverse the downward trend. The first step is to curb our country's fiscal recklessness and to stabilize regulatory burdens that result in tax increases. Next is for the government to begin breaking down economic freedom a step further by state since evidence proves that jobs and businesses created at the state level help to further support economic growth.
In the report, John Hood referenced a 2012 paper in the International Journal of Economics and Finance that stated that higher economic freedom tends to attract higher levels of investment from foreign firms, which then leads to more economic growth. In addition, a 2007 study in the Southern Economic Journal found that states attract another form of valuable capital, people, to the extent they embrace economic freedom.
For related news on financial regulation and tax reform, check out these recent reports on Inside Counsel:
Regulation is top future risk for financial services
Regulatory: Why the SEC's proposed pay-ratio rule will increase compliance costs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
6 minute readFTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250