Protecting the consumer from harm
For businesses to thrive and succeed, they must compete on a level playing field. Unfortunately, there are unscrupulous businesses that seek to profit by skirting laws and operating unethically.
January 26, 2014 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
For businesses to thrive and succeed, they must compete on a level playing field. Unfortunately, there are unscrupulous businesses that seek to profit by skirting laws and operating unethically.
Under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, my office investigates and pursues those who engage in unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive trade practices. We also work closely with the Federal Trade Commission and other states to investigate scams with national or regional impact.
In the past year, the Consumer Protection Division obtained more than $47 million in recoveries in Florida. These numbers do not include the more than $8 billion in consumer benefit received by borrowers from the National Mortgage Settlement, which my office took a leading role in obtaining in 2012.
In December, we reached a settlement with several companies resolving allegations regarding the placement of unauthorized charges on consumer telephone bills, a practice known as “cramming.” The settlement resolved allegations the company and its client companies charged Florida customers for voicemail, e-fax, and other services without the customers' consent.
If customers discovered the charges and complained, they were often only refunded the amount they knew about or two to three months of charges when, in many cases, they had been billed for much longer. Among other things, the settlement obtained $2.3 million in restitution that is available to more than 18,000 Florida consumers. The company is also prohibited from enrolling Florida customers in any third-party services without their consent.
When businesses use deceptive practices to attract consumers, legitimate companies are put in the position of competing in an unfair marketplace. We take our responsibility of protecting both consumers and businesses seriously.
For businesses to thrive and succeed, they must compete on a level playing field. Unfortunately, there are unscrupulous businesses that seek to profit by skirting laws and operating unethically.
Under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, my office investigates and pursues those who engage in unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive trade practices. We also work closely with the Federal Trade Commission and other states to investigate scams with national or regional impact.
In the past year, the Consumer Protection Division obtained more than $47 million in recoveries in Florida. These numbers do not include the more than $8 billion in consumer benefit received by borrowers from the National Mortgage Settlement, which my office took a leading role in obtaining in 2012.
In December, we reached a settlement with several companies resolving allegations regarding the placement of unauthorized charges on consumer telephone bills, a practice known as “cramming.” The settlement resolved allegations the company and its client companies charged Florida customers for voicemail, e-fax, and other services without the customers' consent.
If customers discovered the charges and complained, they were often only refunded the amount they knew about or two to three months of charges when, in many cases, they had been billed for much longer. Among other things, the settlement obtained $2.3 million in restitution that is available to more than 18,000 Florida consumers. The company is also prohibited from enrolling Florida customers in any third-party services without their consent.
When businesses use deceptive practices to attract consumers, legitimate companies are put in the position of competing in an unfair marketplace. We take our responsibility of protecting both consumers and businesses seriously.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 2Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 3How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
- 4People in the News—Feb. 3, 2025—Antheil Maslow, Kang Haggerty, Saxton & Stump
- 5Patent Pending ... and Pending ... and Pending? Brace Yourself for Longer Waits
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250