Big retailers want more regulation in the wake of breaches
Retailers are asking Congress to require them to notify customers when shoppers' information has been put at risk
January 27, 2014 at 04:49 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
One of America's biggest retailers and the king of big-box stores, Target, made headlines during the height of the holiday season — the company had fallen victim to cyber thieves, affecting the data of millions and millions of customers. A few weeks later, luxury retailer, Neiman Marcus announced that it, too, had succumbed to a security breach during four months in 2013 in which a million customers had their credit card data breached too. It seemed to be the worst kind of news for companies, potentially jeopardizing their reputation, and, even worse for customers that rely on security from the major retailers they patronize.
While it seems unlikely that a retailer would want more “heavy-handed” regulations from the government, the National Journal reports that retailers are asking Congress to require them to notify customers when shoppers' information has been put at risk. Supporters of a unified regulation contend would this make things easier for companies, but it would also be easier for firms to serve their customers better by giving businesses a quick and comprehensive way to address hacks. The idea of such a regulation is gaining traction in the beltway and quickly. In fact, Rep. Lee Terry, the chairman of the House Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, has planned a data-security hearing, featuring testimony from a Target executive, as early as next month,
In the Senate, Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy introduced a data-breach bill earlier this month, with the support of fellow Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, and Richard Blumenthal. Leahy, who has backed similar legislation since 2005, said he also plans to hold a hearing on the issue. However, it could be a measure Republicans may not easily support with the idea that such a regulation would be “just another nanny-state” intrusion, and a measure that wrecks of anti-business.
Mary Bono, a former Congresswoman from California, and a Republican who is now a data security advisor for FaegreBD Consulting says the move is not “anti-business” but rather “pro-business.” “It's sort of counterintuitive,” she said. Before losing her last election in 2012, Bono had pushed for a similar regulation but it was never able to gain much ground.
After the Target breach was made public, Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal urged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the company's security practices.
“Customers of companies have a right to expect that their private information will be properly safeguarded and secured,” he told The Hill earlier this month. “The failure to take those steps is not only a violation of trust but also potentially of law.”
FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen also told The Hill the recent high-profile breaches could fuel a national conversation.
“Any time that there is a data breach from a well-known company that impacts a lot of consumers, it brings more attention and more energy to the issue,” the Republican commissioner said. The National Journal reports though The Federal Trade Commission has claimed that it already has the power to go after companies for inadequate data security under its authority to police “unfair” business practices. But the Wyndham Hotel chain and the medical laboratory LabMD have challenged the FTC's actions against them, and the federal courts could decide to strip the FTC of its power in the area.
Related reading:
One of America's biggest retailers and the king of big-box stores, Target, made headlines during the height of the holiday season — the company had fallen victim to cyber thieves, affecting the data of millions and millions of customers. A few weeks later, luxury retailer,
While it seems unlikely that a retailer would want more “heavy-handed” regulations from the government, the National Journal reports that retailers are asking Congress to require them to notify customers when shoppers' information has been put at risk. Supporters of a unified regulation contend would this make things easier for companies, but it would also be easier for firms to serve their customers better by giving businesses a quick and comprehensive way to address hacks. The idea of such a regulation is gaining traction in the beltway and quickly. In fact, Rep. Lee Terry, the chairman of the House Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, has planned a data-security hearing, featuring testimony from a Target executive, as early as next month,
In the Senate, Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy introduced a data-breach bill earlier this month, with the support of fellow Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, and Richard Blumenthal. Leahy, who has backed similar legislation since 2005, said he also plans to hold a hearing on the issue. However, it could be a measure Republicans may not easily support with the idea that such a regulation would be “just another nanny-state” intrusion, and a measure that wrecks of anti-business.
Mary Bono, a former Congresswoman from California, and a Republican who is now a data security advisor for FaegreBD Consulting says the move is not “anti-business” but rather “pro-business.” “It's sort of counterintuitive,” she said. Before losing her last election in 2012, Bono had pushed for a similar regulation but it was never able to gain much ground.
After the Target breach was made public, Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal urged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the company's security practices.
“Customers of companies have a right to expect that their private information will be properly safeguarded and secured,” he told The Hill earlier this month. “The failure to take those steps is not only a violation of trust but also potentially of law.”
FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen also told The Hill the recent high-profile breaches could fuel a national conversation.
“Any time that there is a data breach from a well-known company that impacts a lot of consumers, it brings more attention and more energy to the issue,” the Republican commissioner said. The National Journal reports though The Federal Trade Commission has claimed that it already has the power to go after companies for inadequate data security under its authority to police “unfair” business practices. But the Wyndham Hotel chain and the medical laboratory LabMD have challenged the FTC's actions against them, and the federal courts could decide to strip the FTC of its power in the area.
Related reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
New Merger-Review Process Could Doom Some Deals, Add Headaches, Subjectivity to Others
7 minute readFormer CFTC Chair and SEC Commissioner Chart Election's Impact on Crypto and Capital Markets
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
- 2Pass Rate on California's July 2024 Bar Exam Ticks Up to 53.8%
- 3TEST TEST
- 4$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
- 5Dropping a Client Like a 'Hot Potato'
- 6Cobb County Says Over 3K Absentee Ballots Mailed Late, Just Days Before Election
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250