Deferred-prosecution agreements set to begin in the U.K.
Ahead of the beginning of DPA allowance, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office has released guidance for prosecutors concerning when DPAs will be enforced.
February 18, 2014 at 06:52 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Just as American lawyers are poring over the proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, attorneys in the U.K. now have new rules to abide by as well, specifically dealing with deferred-prosecution agreements.
U.K. attorneys will be able to use deferred-prosecution agreements (DPA) for the first time on Feb. 24. The DPA, which is commonly used in the United States, received royal assent in April 2013.
In a deferred-prosecution agreement, criminal charges against an organization are dropped after a specified period of time if the organization fully complies with a deal supervised by the judge. In the U.K., DPAs will only apply to organizations accused of economic crime.
Ahead of the beginning of DPA allowance, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has released guidance for prosecutors concerning when DPAs will be enforced. According to David Green, director of the SFO, the key reasoning for DPA allowance is to avoid collateral damage to employees and shareholders who may be blameless for a director's economic improprieties.
“Deferred Prosecution Agreements avoid that collateral damage and provide a welcome addition to the prosecutor's tool kit for use in appropriate circumstances,” Green said. “But DPAs are not a panacea, nor are they a mechanism for a corporate offender to buy itself out of trouble.”
Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, added that the inclusion of DPAs allows judges to have another tool in the arsenal to attack economic crime.
“Deferred Prosecution Agreements provide prosecutors with additional powers in the fight against fraud and economic crime,” Saunders said. “Whilst the circumstances appropriate to the use of DPAs may be quite rare for the CPS [Crown Protection Service], the guidelines published today set out our approach to this new legislative function in an open and transparent way.”
According to the Wall Street Journal, there is likely to be more judicial intervention in the U.K. DPA process than there is in the U.S. process. As a result, says Ali Sallaway, a London partner for Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, neither companies nor prosecutors will be forced to sign agreements that they feel are in their own best interest.
For more on overseas regulations that multinational counsel should know, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
Just as American lawyers are poring over the proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, attorneys in the U.K. now have new rules to abide by as well, specifically dealing with deferred-prosecution agreements.
U.K. attorneys will be able to use deferred-prosecution agreements (DPA) for the first time on Feb. 24. The DPA, which is commonly used in the United States, received royal assent in April 2013.
In a deferred-prosecution agreement, criminal charges against an organization are dropped after a specified period of time if the organization fully complies with a deal supervised by the judge. In the U.K., DPAs will only apply to organizations accused of economic crime.
Ahead of the beginning of DPA allowance, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has released guidance for prosecutors concerning when DPAs will be enforced. According to David Green, director of the SFO, the key reasoning for DPA allowance is to avoid collateral damage to employees and shareholders who may be blameless for a director's economic improprieties.
“Deferred Prosecution Agreements avoid that collateral damage and provide a welcome addition to the prosecutor's tool kit for use in appropriate circumstances,” Green said. “But DPAs are not a panacea, nor are they a mechanism for a corporate offender to buy itself out of trouble.”
Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, added that the inclusion of DPAs allows judges to have another tool in the arsenal to attack economic crime.
“Deferred Prosecution Agreements provide prosecutors with additional powers in the fight against fraud and economic crime,” Saunders said. “Whilst the circumstances appropriate to the use of DPAs may be quite rare for the CPS [Crown Protection Service], the guidelines published today set out our approach to this new legislative function in an open and transparent way.”
According to the Wall Street Journal, there is likely to be more judicial intervention in the U.K. DPA process than there is in the U.S. process. As a result, says Ali Sallaway, a London partner for
For more on overseas regulations that multinational counsel should know, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250