USPTO taps Lex Machina for data on infringement letters
Lex Machina has announced that its technology will be used to complement the United States Patent and Trademark Offices (USPTO) new online toolkit, which provides free, public information about demand letters to businesses and consumers.
February 21, 2014 at 05:38 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
On February 20, the White House issued another set of executive actions related to patent reform. These act as an extension to similar actions set forward in June of 2013, which focused on patent assertion entities (PAEs), sometimes known as patent trolls. The new actions focus on a number of initiatives, including strengthening patents, expanding study and enforcement, and protecting small businesses by increasing transparency.
That's where Lex Machina comes in. Lex Machina is a tool that uses Big Data and analytics to help intellectual property professionals get a clear and accurate sense of the IP litigation landscape. IP attorneys and businesses have used the tool to help plan their strategies, and the American Intellectual Property Association has tapped Lex Machina for legal analytics as well.
Now, the company has announced that its technology will be used to complement the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) new online toolkit, which provides free, public information about demand letters to businesses and consumers.
Experts, ranging from general counsel to state attorneys general, identify demand letters as one of the biggest problems in the patent litigation space today. Some PAEs, colloquially known as “patent trolls” send hundreds or thousands of letters, often to small businesses like coffee shops and credit unions.
Lex Machina will enable the USPTO to “empower downstream users,” which is another of the tenants set forth by the White House. The new toolkit will allow recipients of demand letters to upload the demand letters, creating a robust database of letters that will help small businesses see connections between letters, and shedding light on the strategies used by these patent trolls. Access to hard data will empower these small businesses to understand their options and make the right choices in these difficult situations.
For more stories related to patent trolls, check out the following:
On February 20, the White House issued another set of executive actions related to patent reform. These act as an extension to similar actions set forward in June of 2013, which focused on patent assertion entities (PAEs), sometimes known as patent trolls. The new actions focus on a number of initiatives, including strengthening patents, expanding study and enforcement, and protecting small businesses by increasing transparency.
That's where Lex Machina comes in. Lex Machina is a tool that uses Big Data and analytics to help intellectual property professionals get a clear and accurate sense of the IP litigation landscape. IP attorneys and businesses have used the tool to help plan their strategies, and the American Intellectual Property Association has tapped Lex Machina for legal analytics as well.
Now, the company has announced that its technology will be used to complement the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) new online toolkit, which provides free, public information about demand letters to businesses and consumers.
Experts, ranging from general counsel to state attorneys general, identify demand letters as one of the biggest problems in the patent litigation space today. Some PAEs, colloquially known as “patent trolls” send hundreds or thousands of letters, often to small businesses like coffee shops and credit unions.
Lex Machina will enable the USPTO to “empower downstream users,” which is another of the tenants set forth by the White House. The new toolkit will allow recipients of demand letters to upload the demand letters, creating a robust database of letters that will help small businesses see connections between letters, and shedding light on the strategies used by these patent trolls. Access to hard data will empower these small businesses to understand their options and make the right choices in these difficult situations.
For more stories related to patent trolls, check out the following:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
OpenAI Hires First Compliance Chief, Snagging Uber's Scott Schools
Meta Hit With Class Action for Allegedly Using Pirated Books to Train AI Models
Trending Stories
- 1CLOSED: These Georgia Courts Won't Open Jan. 10
- 2Volkswagen Hit With Consumer Class Action Alleging Defective SUV Engines
- 3‘Be Comfortable With the Uncomfortable’
- 4Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Delaware Courts to Address in 2025
- 5Adapting to AI and the Needs of Lawyers Will Be Key For Shutts & Bowen, Says Incoming Ft. Lauderdale Leader
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250