FINRA fines Berthel Fisher, highlights the importance of compliance
On February 24, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined financial and investment firm Berthel Fisher $775,000 for compliance failure.
February 25, 2014 at 04:16 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As financial companies know, compliance lawsuits can be expensive, which is why it is vital to have a competent compliance staff. We have witnessed in the U.S. — since the 2008 financial crisis — the growing importance of having a chief compliance officer, particularly with legislation requiring companies of certain sizes and business practices to keep one on staff. In fact, the Securities and Exchange Commission has made a point of cracking down on financial firms' compliance missteps. Yet, examples persist demonstrating the dangers of having sub-par compliance procedures in place. On February 24, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined financial and investment firm Berthel Fisher $775,000 for compliance failure.
Brad Bennett, FINRA's executive vice president of enforcement, stated that Berthel Fisher had failed to adequately train and supervise brokers selling investments including non-traded real estate trusts and leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds.
He said that the investment broker “had inadequate supervisory systems and written procedures for sales” and he further emphasized the importance of having adequate compliance structures in place:
“A strong culture of compliance is an essential element of the proper marketing of complex products. Berthel's supervision of the sales of nontraded REITs, inverse ETFs and other products fell short of this standard, as it failed to ensure that its registered representatives understood the unique features and risks of these products before presenting them to retail clients.”
The fine is a result of an examination of Berthel Fisher's practices from January 2008 through December 2012, but in the same investigation found that the investment broker did not have a reasonable basis for sales of some leveraged and inverse EFTs from April 2009 to April 2012. The failure to comply with supervisory and training standards has left Berthel Fisher three-quarters of $1 million out of pocket, not to mention likely a bit stung from FINRA's slap on the wrist. Rather than confirming or denying any of the charges, the investment company has simply consented to the regulator's findings.
Financial firms would do well to take FINRA's fine against Berthel Fisher to heart as another reminder of the essential requirement of having an adequate compliance policy and staff. InsideCounsel's Rich Steeves interviewed Todd Cipperman, founding principal of Cipperman Compliance Services to discuss some of the pain points for companies that struggle with maintaining sufficient compliance. While compliance is commonly seen as more of an annoyance than a beneficial operation, Cipperman spotlighted its necessity with a familiar analogy:
“You may not like that it is snowing out. You can yell about it and hope it doesn't. But all you can really do is wear the right clothing.”
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readEx-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250