Drug giants sued for mismarketing of widely used drug
Stuntebecks lawsuit claims that the drug makers marketed a one size fits all drug, but was mismarketed to patients as such, and many patients were put at risk because of the misinformation delivered by physicians.
February 26, 2014 at 04:22 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Xarelto is an anti-coagulant drug made by Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Bayer Corp. — both of which are now being sued for a products liability claim regarding the substance. Virginia G. Stuntebeck is filing a suit against the makers of the drug as she alleges that the drug caused severe internal and gastrointestinal bleeding after being prescribed to her for atrial fibrillation — the fibrillation of the muscles of the atria of the heart, a common type of arrhythmia. Xarelto has been primarily used to reduce the risk of, and/or treat, stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Stuntebeck's lawsuit claims that the drug makers marketed a “one size fits all” drug, but was mismarketed to patients as such, and many patients were put at risk because of the misinformation delivered by physicians. Risks were not made clear for serious and fatal bleeding, and the marketing for the drug further indicated that it was easier to use than other drugs because of its lack of required monitoring for internal bleeding once the patient takes the drug.
Negligence, products liability, breach of implied and express warranties, fraud, violation of consumer protection laws, unreasonable marketing, and unreasonable failure to remove the drug from the market are all counts of the plaintiff's lawsuit. As the mismarketing of the drug is one of the key points at the heart of the lawsuit, reports quote the plaintiff's complaint, which claims that Janssen and Bayer “fervently marketed Xarelto using print advertisements, online marketing on their website, and video advertisements with no regard to the accuracy and repercussions of their misleading advertising in favor of increasing sales.”
130,000 prescriptions for Xarelto were written in the first three months of 2012.
Drugwatch has described the similar dangerous qualities between Xarelto and a drug that has come under serious fire in the U.S. for creating similar potentially fatal bleeding in patients: Pradaxa. 200 lawsuits have been filed by victims and families of victims as a result of hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries as a result of taking Pradaxa as prescribed.
And this is not the first time, of course, that Bayer has been involved in major lawsuits for some of its drugs. 2013's debacle over the birth control pills Yasmin and Yaz involving Bayer AG resulted in the U.S. Federal Circuit invalidating the company's patent on Yaz. Bayer had been involved in millions of dollars of settlement claims for patients that suffered gallbladder injuries as a result of taking the birth control pills.
Further reading:
Xarelto is an anti-coagulant drug made by
Stuntebeck's lawsuit claims that the drug makers marketed a “one size fits all” drug, but was mismarketed to patients as such, and many patients were put at risk because of the misinformation delivered by physicians. Risks were not made clear for serious and fatal bleeding, and the marketing for the drug further indicated that it was easier to use than other drugs because of its lack of required monitoring for internal bleeding once the patient takes the drug.
Negligence, products liability, breach of implied and express warranties, fraud, violation of consumer protection laws, unreasonable marketing, and unreasonable failure to remove the drug from the market are all counts of the plaintiff's lawsuit. As the mismarketing of the drug is one of the key points at the heart of the lawsuit, reports quote the plaintiff's complaint, which claims that Janssen and Bayer “fervently marketed Xarelto using print advertisements, online marketing on their website, and video advertisements with no regard to the accuracy and repercussions of their misleading advertising in favor of increasing sales.”
130,000 prescriptions for Xarelto were written in the first three months of 2012.
Drugwatch has described the similar dangerous qualities between Xarelto and a drug that has come under serious fire in the U.S. for creating similar potentially fatal bleeding in patients: Pradaxa. 200 lawsuits have been filed by victims and families of victims as a result of hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries as a result of taking Pradaxa as prescribed.
And this is not the first time, of course, that Bayer has been involved in major lawsuits for some of its drugs. 2013's debacle over the birth control pills Yasmin and Yaz involving
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250