Reducing discovery challenges through innovative use of technology in cross-border litigation
Mobile technology and cloud computing can certainly mitigate the challenges of cross-border litigation by reducing the complexities of multinational companies with offices spread across continents and jurisdictions.
March 06, 2014 at 03:00 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Today's global economy has generated multinational companies of all sizes, with offices spread across continents and jurisdictions, rendering the “copy and ship” approach to discovery a potential disaster. But can the use of mobile technology and cloud computing mitigate these challenges?
This article will look at these challenges and outline what your company should be aware of and what precautions you can take to avoid any disasters. This three-part series has consisted of the following topics: Available resources (vendors, consultants) outside of the U.S., the effects of cultural differences and data privacy regulations, and innovative use of technology.
E-discovery on the go
As mentioned in part 1 of this series, it can be extremely difficult to find experienced litigation support and e-discovery resources outside of the United States. One might expect to be able to make a quick call to any number of locations in Europe or Asia, but there simply are not any local vendors or consultants there and, if there are, their qualifications are questionable. However, the evolution of computer hardware, operating systems and e-discovery software has enabled innovative U.S. service providers to develop portable e-discovery solutions which can be utilized at virtually any location in the world, becoming an experienced “local resource” wherever and whenever needed.
Portable e-discovery workstations can be self-contained or “work grouped” to provide on-site, near-site or off-site e-discovery solutions which include data collection, early data assessment, data processing, and document review services to suit the specific requirements of a given matter.
These high performance workstations provide a cost-effective alternative to the typical industry approach of “copy and ship” data to an off-site facility for downstream processing. While shipping data back to the United States might be suitable for some projects, it can prove challenging when dealing with matter having cross-border privacy concerns, tight deadlines, trade secrets or a lack of appropriate resources. Furthermore, portable e-discovery solutions do not only alleviate these challenges of shipping data, but often can do so at competitive price points which are comparable to using a local vendor in the United States.
Cloudy with a chance of innovation
Since its initial beginnings, e-discovery has been transformed drastically, now having an exciting array of technology options for managing data which is exponentially different in variety, scale, source and complexity. This is further complicated by today's trend toward the globalization of many industries, the proliferation of multi-national companies and the complexities of cross border litigation.
Cloud computing, defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology as “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction,” has made cross-border e-discovery significantly easier, with providers such as Amazon Web Services providing virtually unlimited on-demand capacity from secure data centers in Brazil, China, Ireland, Japan, Singapore and the United States. As a significant additional benefit to this capacity and footprint, a group of cloud servers can provide the same processing and storage capabilities as a single high-end server for a fraction of the price.
Innovative solutions have come online which leverage a cloud infrastructure to provide superior performance, reliability, security and functionality at ultra-competitive price points. These innovative e-discovery platforms have escaped from the legacy architecture of massive servers, storage devices and data centers to the freedom of on-demand cloud computing, which can strategically store evidentiary data within regional centers for secure review by legal teams around the word.
The use of mobile technology and cloud computing can certainly mitigate the challenges of cross-border litigation by reducing the complexities of multinational companies with offices spread across continents and jurisdictions. Mobile technology and cloud computing simply render the “copy and ship” approach to discovery as a distant option for cross-border discovery.
Today's global economy has generated multinational companies of all sizes, with offices spread across continents and jurisdictions, rendering the “copy and ship” approach to discovery a potential disaster. But can the use of mobile technology and cloud computing mitigate these challenges?
This article will look at these challenges and outline what your company should be aware of and what precautions you can take to avoid any disasters. This three-part series has consisted of the following topics: Available resources (vendors, consultants) outside of the U.S., the effects of cultural differences and data privacy regulations, and innovative use of technology.
E-discovery on the go
As mentioned in part 1 of this series, it can be extremely difficult to find experienced litigation support and e-discovery resources outside of the United States. One might expect to be able to make a quick call to any number of locations in Europe or Asia, but there simply are not any local vendors or consultants there and, if there are, their qualifications are questionable. However, the evolution of computer hardware, operating systems and e-discovery software has enabled innovative U.S. service providers to develop portable e-discovery solutions which can be utilized at virtually any location in the world, becoming an experienced “local resource” wherever and whenever needed.
Portable e-discovery workstations can be self-contained or “work grouped” to provide on-site, near-site or off-site e-discovery solutions which include data collection, early data assessment, data processing, and document review services to suit the specific requirements of a given matter.
These high performance workstations provide a cost-effective alternative to the typical industry approach of “copy and ship” data to an off-site facility for downstream processing. While shipping data back to the United States might be suitable for some projects, it can prove challenging when dealing with matter having cross-border privacy concerns, tight deadlines, trade secrets or a lack of appropriate resources. Furthermore, portable e-discovery solutions do not only alleviate these challenges of shipping data, but often can do so at competitive price points which are comparable to using a local vendor in the United States.
Cloudy with a chance of innovation
Since its initial beginnings, e-discovery has been transformed drastically, now having an exciting array of technology options for managing data which is exponentially different in variety, scale, source and complexity. This is further complicated by today's trend toward the globalization of many industries, the proliferation of multi-national companies and the complexities of cross border litigation.
Cloud computing, defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology as “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction,” has made cross-border e-discovery significantly easier, with providers such as
Innovative solutions have come online which leverage a cloud infrastructure to provide superior performance, reliability, security and functionality at ultra-competitive price points. These innovative e-discovery platforms have escaped from the legacy architecture of massive servers, storage devices and data centers to the freedom of on-demand cloud computing, which can strategically store evidentiary data within regional centers for secure review by legal teams around the word.
The use of mobile technology and cloud computing can certainly mitigate the challenges of cross-border litigation by reducing the complexities of multinational companies with offices spread across continents and jurisdictions. Mobile technology and cloud computing simply render the “copy and ship” approach to discovery as a distant option for cross-border discovery.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250