Federal Reserve Bank of New York president criticizes Wall Street culture
William C. Dudley says that big banks misdeeds are indicative of a problem with the larger financial industry rather than simply a few bad actors.
March 17, 2014 at 08:08 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Well sure, Wells Fargo and HSBC may have settled lawsuits for insurance overcharging. And maybe a Citigroup affiliate may have violated the Bank Secrecy Act through money laundering. Perhaps JPMorgan settled for $400 million with Syncora over mortgage-backed securities fraud, and it was not even close to their largest financial crisis settlement. And it may be true that these acts have all come within two weeks of one another.
However, does the recent rash of litigation on Wall Street mean that the whole system is broken? According to one prominent regulator, that indeed is the case.
William C. Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, is publicly speaking out against major banks, saying that big banks' misdeeds are indicative of a problem with the larger financial industry rather than simply a few bad actors.
“There is evidence of deep-seated cultural and ethical failures at many large financial institutions,” Dudley said in a speech last year. He recently elaborated to the New York Times, saying that he is going on the offensive “to make it clear that 'too big to fail' isn't the only problem. I don't want senior bank management to feel, 'Oh gee, if we solve “too big to fail,” we're done.' ”
When Dudley speaks, big banks listen. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York works on a close basis with many Wall Street financial institutions, with the NYT saying that Dudley's agency “has more day-to-day contact with Wall Street than any other arm of the government.”
According to Dudley, one of the major issues facing banks currently is the public relations battle. Despite the work of regulators to instill public confidence in banks through tough restrictions, banks often undo any good work with even more misdeeds.
“I think that they really do have a serious issue with the public,” Dudley said. “And I think that trust issue is of their own doing — they have done it to themselves.”
Notably, many Wall Street executives have not come out in support of Dudley's statements. Many large financial institutions also claim that they simply have too many employees to be able to keep track of everyone. Dudley, however, says that regulators will not accept excuses.
“Either the firm is not too complex, you can manage it, you do know what's going on,” he said. “Or, if you don't know, that's sort of raising the question whether the firm is too complex to manage.”
For more on regulatory challenges in the financial industry, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
Well sure,
However, does the recent rash of litigation on Wall Street mean that the whole system is broken? According to one prominent regulator, that indeed is the case.
William C. Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve
“There is evidence of deep-seated cultural and ethical failures at many large financial institutions,” Dudley said in a speech last year. He recently elaborated to the
When Dudley speaks, big banks listen. The Federal Reserve
According to Dudley, one of the major issues facing banks currently is the public relations battle. Despite the work of regulators to instill public confidence in banks through tough restrictions, banks often undo any good work with even more misdeeds.
“I think that they really do have a serious issue with the public,” Dudley said. “And I think that trust issue is of their own doing — they have done it to themselves.”
Notably, many Wall Street executives have not come out in support of Dudley's statements. Many large financial institutions also claim that they simply have too many employees to be able to keep track of everyone. Dudley, however, says that regulators will not accept excuses.
“Either the firm is not too complex, you can manage it, you do know what's going on,” he said. “Or, if you don't know, that's sort of raising the question whether the firm is too complex to manage.”
For more on regulatory challenges in the financial industry, check out these InsideCounsel articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
Don't Rush to Change That Noncompete Just Yet, Employment Lawyers Advise
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250