A welcome helping hand from Washington
This time the government actually is here to help. As a result, operating companies, and especially small businesses, will be increasingly able to respond effectively to the rising tide of patent monetization.
March 24, 2014 at 08:00 PM
6 minute read
Ronald Reagan always got a laugh when he said the last sentence any business owner wanted to hear was: “I'm from the government and I'm here to help.” Sometimes, though, just the opposite is true, and right now small businesses facing a barrage of non-practicing entity (NPE) letter campaigns are looking for help wherever they can get it.
The Obama administration is extending that helping hand. We at RPX were honored to be invited to participate in a White House event on Feb. 20 highlighting the one-year anniversary of the President's “call to action” to fight NPE litigation and patent abuses. There, we heard about the progress of several initiatives designed to increase patent quality and ownership transparency, including new rules from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) designed to enhance ownership information, better technical training and resources for examiners, and more collaboration with academia to disseminate data and research on abusive litigation.
A timely and practical initiative announced at the event is a new USPTO website dedicated to helping small businesses deal with the growing flood of intimidating—and often dubious—assertion letters. The site, www.uspto.gov/patentlitigation, is an “online toolkit” that contains background information designed to bring small business owners quickly up to speed on the NPE business model and patent assertions. The toolkit also includes links to a variety of Web-based services and information resources (including RPX data) that can help NPE targets determine the best response to an assertion letter.
The toolkit is a welcome and encouraging step that shows progress on the President's commitment to improve transparency and begin rationalizing the current patent ecosystem. Sharing information is the foundation of any effort to limit the costs of NPE lawsuits and litigation-based patent monetization. As the site attracts more users and becomes more robust, companies should be able to avoid or reduce the costs of many of the onerous and expensive responses to patents being asserted. Today, defendants of a single NPE campaign are typically paying for separate and parallel efforts to assess their risk from the claim, seriousness of the assertion, prior art searches and more. A centralized information resource can eliminate that duplication of legal effort.
That said, I should note that some observers have been underwhelmed by the launch and think the toolkit is a little light on functionality. But while the site—like many initial steps toward a long-term solution—has room for improvement, I see the glass as half full and applaud the USPTO for taking a concrete first step toward a key Obama administration goal. I also fully expect the site to keep improving. It's not difficult to envision that versions 2.0-plus of the site can include a truly interactive, tactical platform offering everything from crowd-sourced patent threat assessment and patent dossiers to centralized prior art data and more.
For now, though, I'm especially encouraged that the site is proving that the USPTO and private industry can collaborate to achieve shared goals. As the larger debate about patent reform grows more serious on Capitol Hill, we are pleased to see that policymakers recognize that transparency and sharing resources can reduce the cost and risk of NPE assertions.
This time the government actually is here to help. As a result, operating companies, and especially small businesses, will be increasingly able to respond effectively to the rising tide of patent monetization.
Ronald Reagan always got a laugh when he said the last sentence any business owner wanted to hear was: “I'm from the government and I'm here to help.” Sometimes, though, just the opposite is true, and right now small businesses facing a barrage of non-practicing entity (NPE) letter campaigns are looking for help wherever they can get it.
The Obama administration is extending that helping hand. We at RPX were honored to be invited to participate in a White House event on Feb. 20 highlighting the one-year anniversary of the President's “call to action” to fight NPE litigation and patent abuses. There, we heard about the progress of several initiatives designed to increase patent quality and ownership transparency, including new rules from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) designed to enhance ownership information, better technical training and resources for examiners, and more collaboration with academia to disseminate data and research on abusive litigation.
A timely and practical initiative announced at the event is a new USPTO website dedicated to helping small businesses deal with the growing flood of intimidating—and often dubious—assertion letters. The site, www.uspto.gov/patentlitigation, is an “online toolkit” that contains background information designed to bring small business owners quickly up to speed on the NPE business model and patent assertions. The toolkit also includes links to a variety of Web-based services and information resources (including RPX data) that can help NPE targets determine the best response to an assertion letter.
The toolkit is a welcome and encouraging step that shows progress on the President's commitment to improve transparency and begin rationalizing the current patent ecosystem. Sharing information is the foundation of any effort to limit the costs of NPE lawsuits and litigation-based patent monetization. As the site attracts more users and becomes more robust, companies should be able to avoid or reduce the costs of many of the onerous and expensive responses to patents being asserted. Today, defendants of a single NPE campaign are typically paying for separate and parallel efforts to assess their risk from the claim, seriousness of the assertion, prior art searches and more. A centralized information resource can eliminate that duplication of legal effort.
That said, I should note that some observers have been underwhelmed by the launch and think the toolkit is a little light on functionality. But while the site—like many initial steps toward a long-term solution—has room for improvement, I see the glass as half full and applaud the USPTO for taking a concrete first step toward a key Obama administration goal. I also fully expect the site to keep improving. It's not difficult to envision that versions 2.0-plus of the site can include a truly interactive, tactical platform offering everything from crowd-sourced patent threat assessment and patent dossiers to centralized prior art data and more.
For now, though, I'm especially encouraged that the site is proving that the USPTO and private industry can collaborate to achieve shared goals. As the larger debate about patent reform grows more serious on Capitol Hill, we are pleased to see that policymakers recognize that transparency and sharing resources can reduce the cost and risk of NPE assertions.
This time the government actually is here to help. As a result, operating companies, and especially small businesses, will be increasingly able to respond effectively to the rising tide of patent monetization.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250