Cultivating the legal ecosystem: Recognizing the need to innovate
Professionals in our field are becoming familiar with the concept of the legal ecosystem, a term that conveys relationships shared by corporate and other clients, outside counsel and third-party service providers.
March 24, 2014 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
Professionals in our field are becoming familiar with the concept of the “legal ecosystem,” a term that conveys relationships shared by corporate and other clients, outside counsel and third-party service providers.
In viewing these relationships as an ecosystem, perhaps the biggest “environmental concern” is the misalignment between ever-increasing budget pressures in corporate legal departments and law firms striving to remain profitable in a highly competitive market.
As one of the leaders of the NetApp legal team, I have seen the significant benefits of applying innovative and bottom-line approaches throughout the legal ecosystem. These include better utilization of in-house talent, more collaborative and mutually beneficial relationships with outside counsel, higher morale across the board and a notable reduction in annual outside legal expenditures.
So, what concrete steps can we take to put this new philosophy into practice?
Establish management and collaborate
Budgets are tight, and the cost of outside counsel has led many corporations to hire full-time legal operations professionals (more about that trend at http://bit.ly/1fC7X6M.) This specialized management role is designed to run the legal department more like a business. Think of the role of Brad Pitt's character, Billy Beane, in “Moneyball”—someone who knows the game inside and out, and who can identify and solve inefficiencies that others may not even see.
Successful legal operations must collaborate closely with outside counsel. Open communication and the sharing of information provide the most practical and fruitful path to innovation. At NetApp we conduct periodic business reviews with outside counsel. The meetings are focused on identifying bright spots and pain points in the working relationship. Achieving symbiosis in the legal ecosystem requires that we have these critical conversations.
Adopt new technology
Technology that didn't exist just a few years back has created new opportunities to make the legal ecosystem leaner and more efficient. One game-changer is the active collection and application and transparency of data. NetApp has been using analytics software that allows us to benchmark outside counsel against our own set of firms and firms providing similar services, revealing where they stand in terms of value alignment. We openly share this data, which allows us to make program and budget adjustments where necessary. The purpose is not necessarily to reduce or divert budgets, but rather to maximize the output of our resources that in the end benefits all.
Factor third-party service providers
Today the legal ecosystem includes new players—from startups to established vendors— that focus specifically on providing efficient services and helping legal operate more like a business.
In evaluating your legal spend, I encourage you to again think like Moneyball's Billy Beane: Where are the inefficiencies? You will likely find that there are routine or low-risk projects that don't need to be handled by a firm at all.
Next steps
We are making progress, but there is much that can be done to break free of entrenched inefficiencies that continue to feed the misalignment between corporations and outside counsel.
I encourage you to join the many legal professionals working to improve our industry. There are five major Legal Operations Consortium groups that have been in existence for many years in New York, Chicago, Houston and Northern and Southern California.
Firms, corporations and third-party service providers must first be open and willing to recognize the potential of change, adopt new management and technology and have the critical conversations to realize the many benefits of cultivating the legal ecosystem.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250