Cultivating the legal ecosystem: Recognizing the need to innovate
Professionals in our field are becoming familiar with the concept of the legal ecosystem, a term that conveys relationships shared by corporate and other clients, outside counsel and third-party service providers.
March 24, 2014 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
Professionals in our field are becoming familiar with the concept of the “legal ecosystem,” a term that conveys relationships shared by corporate and other clients, outside counsel and third-party service providers.
In viewing these relationships as an ecosystem, perhaps the biggest “environmental concern” is the misalignment between ever-increasing budget pressures in corporate legal departments and law firms striving to remain profitable in a highly competitive market.
As one of the leaders of the NetApp legal team, I have seen the significant benefits of applying innovative and bottom-line approaches throughout the legal ecosystem. These include better utilization of in-house talent, more collaborative and mutually beneficial relationships with outside counsel, higher morale across the board and a notable reduction in annual outside legal expenditures.
So, what concrete steps can we take to put this new philosophy into practice?
Establish management and collaborate
Budgets are tight, and the cost of outside counsel has led many corporations to hire full-time legal operations professionals (more about that trend at http://bit.ly/1fC7X6M.) This specialized management role is designed to run the legal department more like a business. Think of the role of Brad Pitt's character, Billy Beane, in “Moneyball”—someone who knows the game inside and out, and who can identify and solve inefficiencies that others may not even see.
Successful legal operations must collaborate closely with outside counsel. Open communication and the sharing of information provide the most practical and fruitful path to innovation. At NetApp we conduct periodic business reviews with outside counsel. The meetings are focused on identifying bright spots and pain points in the working relationship. Achieving symbiosis in the legal ecosystem requires that we have these critical conversations.
Adopt new technology
Technology that didn't exist just a few years back has created new opportunities to make the legal ecosystem leaner and more efficient. One game-changer is the active collection and application and transparency of data. NetApp has been using analytics software that allows us to benchmark outside counsel against our own set of firms and firms providing similar services, revealing where they stand in terms of value alignment. We openly share this data, which allows us to make program and budget adjustments where necessary. The purpose is not necessarily to reduce or divert budgets, but rather to maximize the output of our resources that in the end benefits all.
Factor third-party service providers
Today the legal ecosystem includes new players—from startups to established vendors— that focus specifically on providing efficient services and helping legal operate more like a business.
In evaluating your legal spend, I encourage you to again think like Moneyball's Billy Beane: Where are the inefficiencies? You will likely find that there are routine or low-risk projects that don't need to be handled by a firm at all.
Next steps
We are making progress, but there is much that can be done to break free of entrenched inefficiencies that continue to feed the misalignment between corporations and outside counsel.
I encourage you to join the many legal professionals working to improve our industry. There are five major Legal Operations Consortium groups that have been in existence for many years in New York, Chicago, Houston and Northern and Southern California.
Firms, corporations and third-party service providers must first be open and willing to recognize the potential of change, adopt new management and technology and have the critical conversations to realize the many benefits of cultivating the legal ecosystem.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250