Reducing lawyer turnover
Bob, the general counsel of a privately held company, faced what he perceived to be excessive turnover on his staff. This was costly, time consuming and disruptive.
March 24, 2014 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
“Bob,” the general counsel of a privately held company, faced what he perceived to be excessive turnover on his staff. This was costly, time consuming and disruptive.
When I met with Bob as his new coach, I searched for what might be wrong. He seemed thoughtful and kind. Bob is the type of person who wants people to be happy and stay. He thought those who left had good reason.
It turns out that, like in many small legal departments—he had three lawyers, a paralegal and an assistant—there was no way for people below him to move up unless he left. I've heard about this issue in larger companies as well. So, what should a GC do?
Transparency: Acknowledge the problem
Every exit interview Bob conducted revealed that people wanted more responsibility and growth potential. Bob decided to address the issue directly with his staff. He acknowledged that there was no upward mobility for him or them. Titles and pay were not likely to be substantially upgraded either. His staff indicated that they enjoyed being with the company, but acknowledged that they felt their professional careers had stagnated and that this would affect their long-term careers.
Develop a personal growth path
Rather than say “get used to it,” Bob began to think of alternative strategies to increase his team's desire to stay. He then worked with each person to develop a personal growth plan. Some of the ideas he suggested:
Take on more of a business role within the company. If the staff member had interest in a particular area of the business, he or she could spend some extra time learning that area and perhaps expand responsibilities.
Learn more about areas of law where they would like to grow, take courses, get more involved in those areas in the company and do that work. That way, the legal work would not have to go outside, and the lawyer would gain broader experience.
Pick up areas where the legal department was not yet servicing a need. The company had a lot of IP, contracts and some litigation. By expanding to other areas where legal was not yet involved, especially those areas where business risk may have increased, both the lawyer and the company could benefit.
Mentor businesspeople on legal issues by becoming more involved with business issues and offer to work with people to help them learn so they can be more knowledgeable of legal matters.
Prepare training seminars on legal issues for the company's non-lawyers.
Bob also offered to help the staff work on and build strong resumes so when they were ready to leave, they would be better prepared.
Moving into action
Bob's genuine interest in helping his staff members prepare for their next career move made a difference to them because they wanted to learn and grow. One lawyer learned to do licensing. Before this initiative, the company rarely licensed its brand. The lawyer took a licensing course and learned how to negotiate, draft and review licensing agreements. When the company was ready to do more licensing, so was the lawyer, and there was no need to bring in outside counsel.
Another person got deeply involved with a business group in the company. The group appreciated the effort and eventually offered him a position in their department, giving him further growth potential.
It seemed counterintuitive, but by acknowledging that career growth was limited in the legal department and offering to prepare his staff for their next positions, this GC reduced turnover and had a happier staff. His effort turned the group into a team, with members who wanted to stay until moving on became the best choice. He also let the company know what he was doing, so when turnover happened, the reasons would be clearer.
“Bob,” the general counsel of a privately held company, faced what he perceived to be excessive turnover on his staff. This was costly, time consuming and disruptive.
When I met with Bob as his new coach, I searched for what might be wrong. He seemed thoughtful and kind. Bob is the type of person who wants people to be happy and stay. He thought those who left had good reason.
It turns out that, like in many small legal departments—he had three lawyers, a paralegal and an assistant—there was no way for people below him to move up unless he left. I've heard about this issue in larger companies as well. So, what should a GC do?
Transparency: Acknowledge the problem
Every exit interview Bob conducted revealed that people wanted more responsibility and growth potential. Bob decided to address the issue directly with his staff. He acknowledged that there was no upward mobility for him or them. Titles and pay were not likely to be substantially upgraded either. His staff indicated that they enjoyed being with the company, but acknowledged that they felt their professional careers had stagnated and that this would affect their long-term careers.
Develop a personal growth path
Rather than say “get used to it,” Bob began to think of alternative strategies to increase his team's desire to stay. He then worked with each person to develop a personal growth plan. Some of the ideas he suggested:
Take on more of a business role within the company. If the staff member had interest in a particular area of the business, he or she could spend some extra time learning that area and perhaps expand responsibilities.
Learn more about areas of law where they would like to grow, take courses, get more involved in those areas in the company and do that work. That way, the legal work would not have to go outside, and the lawyer would gain broader experience.
Pick up areas where the legal department was not yet servicing a need. The company had a lot of IP, contracts and some litigation. By expanding to other areas where legal was not yet involved, especially those areas where business risk may have increased, both the lawyer and the company could benefit.
Mentor businesspeople on legal issues by becoming more involved with business issues and offer to work with people to help them learn so they can be more knowledgeable of legal matters.
Prepare training seminars on legal issues for the company's non-lawyers.
Bob also offered to help the staff work on and build strong resumes so when they were ready to leave, they would be better prepared.
Moving into action
Bob's genuine interest in helping his staff members prepare for their next career move made a difference to them because they wanted to learn and grow. One lawyer learned to do licensing. Before this initiative, the company rarely licensed its brand. The lawyer took a licensing course and learned how to negotiate, draft and review licensing agreements. When the company was ready to do more licensing, so was the lawyer, and there was no need to bring in outside counsel.
Another person got deeply involved with a business group in the company. The group appreciated the effort and eventually offered him a position in their department, giving him further growth potential.
It seemed counterintuitive, but by acknowledging that career growth was limited in the legal department and offering to prepare his staff for their next positions, this GC reduced turnover and had a happier staff. His effort turned the group into a team, with members who wanted to stay until moving on became the best choice. He also let the company know what he was doing, so when turnover happened, the reasons would be clearer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250