Dealing with misbehavior in the C-Suite, part 2
While every executive knows that there will inevitably be problems that must be addressed, not everyone in the C-Suite knows how best to address them.
March 26, 2014 at 05:54 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the first installment in this series, Julie Anne Preng, managing partner, Korn/Ferry International used a recent story – that of General Motors' mishandling of a fatal ignition switch issue – as an example of how leadership failures can be sins of omission. While Preng pointed out that we certainly don't know what executives at GM were aware of, or if there was any specific wrongdoing at the top, the incident can be seen as a hypothetical cautionary tale. Because, while every executive knows that there will inevitably be problems that must be addressed, not everyone in the C-Suite knows how best to address them.
“A big part of corporate governance is ethical culture,” Preng says, “but you have to substantiate it with behaviors.” There is a regulatory component, of course, be it Sarbanes-Oxley or Dodd-Frank, but what it often boils down to is enterprise risk management (ERM) and the risk tolerance level in an organization's leadership. This dictates whether bad behavior or situations — such as corporate officers who fail to act in accordance with their duties– result in investigations.
When something goes wrong, what will the people in the C-Suite do? “Will they go the distance and make sure that the baby bear does not turn into Godzilla, or will they say, 'we just have a baby bear; if we neutralize it we can go forward'?” Corporate officers who are real leaders will have enough judgment and intuition to make the decision to dig deep and carry an investigation through to the end.
Frequently, corporate officers throw around the phrase “tone from the top,” indicating that the executives should lead the way for the rest of the company when it comes to ethical behavior. But, says Preng, just because it is a cliché does not diminish its importance. The tone from the top can help distinguish between compliance – meeting rules and guidelines that an external agency has established – and ethics, which Preng says covers everything from who you hire to what your business goals are beyond just making money.
There's another saying out there: “Good compliance is good business.” If you run an organization that can stay off the radar of regulators, you don't have to spend big money getting out of a deferred prosecution agreement, for example, and can spend it on innovation. But, Preng notes that “a strong ethical commitment is great business,” as that gives pride to employees. And, she notes, studies show that the best leaders are the ones who combine practical intelligence with emotional intelligence, and one of the biggest drivers for employee engagement is feeling that they are valued by the organization. With a strong governance program and ethical behavior, executives can demonstrate leadership and create a culture that fosters loyalty and engagement. And that is good for business.
Preng will be speaking on this topic and more at SuperConference. The event, taking place from May 12-14, 2014 in Chicago, Ill., will bring together senior-level in-house counsel from around the country to help attendees elevate legal knowledge, foster innovation in legal departments and help counsel become better strategic partners. For more about the event, click here.
For related stories, check out the following:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250