Internet governance changes could challenge businesses
Cybersecurity issues pose a threat to attorney-client privilege and new methods of communication have made electronic discovery and litigation support more complex.
March 27, 2014 at 05:55 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's no surprise that around the globe, governments and businesses were furious about revelations by former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden regarding American intelligence snooping on the data of its own citizens. A lot of this has to do with protestations by national leaders whose own intelligence agencies do much the same thing, but with less success than the U.S. National Security Agency.
Forbes recently reported that Snowden's actions had an immediate effect on parts of the technology industry, but the fallout will soon move into other areas including in the global legal sector. Cybersecurity issues pose a threat to attorney-client privilege and new methods of communication have made electronic discovery and litigation support more complex.
Snowden's portrayal of a government tapping cell phones, cataloging call logs and hoovering up data traffic has kicked legislative bodies into gear. From the European Commission to the United Nations and national parliaments in Brazil, Germany, Japan and more, new cyber infrastructure and laws are moving ahead – aimed at bypassing routers, cables or other nodes vulnerable to the tentacles of the NSA. However, these actions are likely to make data even more accessible to the intelligence and law enforcement agencies of the governments leading these changes.
So far, the biggest effect of this came out last month when proposals for a new Europe-to-Brazil trans-Atlantic cable to avoid the current route through Miami dominated the normally commercial agenda of the annual EU-Brazil Summit. Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, both of whom had their personal phones tapped by NSA, support the proposal, and plans are in motion to finance it through a joint venture between Brazil's Telebras and the Spanish firm IslaLink Submarine Cables.
Earlier this month, the European Parliament passed a non-binding resolution calling for the immediate suspension of the US-EU Safe Harbor framework that facilitates transatlantic data exchanges. In India, Japan, Germany, Brazil, Russia and other countries, laws are being drafted to require that Internet servers be based on national territory, that data collection records are not removed from the country, and social media apps have privacy controls that conform to local law. Restrictions would place burden on the compliance efforts of Internet companies, that Google, Microsoft and others might pull up stakes rather than navigate new legal thickets.
According to Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, U.S. software firms may lose $35 billion in sales overseas through 2016. Although, Forrester research suggests losses could be five times that amount. Forbes reports that some of those revenues will go to non-US competitors, but in some industries, the idea of the “cloud” could evaporate as security-conscious businesses revert to Earth-bound hardware.
Leading this charge are Brazil and Germany, with German influence in the EU to revive debates over the governance of the Internet. The standards of the Internet are controlled by the Los Angeles-based ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers). But, the Snowden controversy has revived the issue, with many Latin American countries issuing a Montevideo declaration in 2013 that “expressed strong concern over the undermining of the trust and confidence of Internet users globally due to recent revelations of pervasive monitoring and surveillance.”
For more on Internet governance, check out these articles:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250