The role of business in preventing modern-day slavery
International laws and rules to address human trafficking have been in place for decades, but new efforts are being made around the world to confront this terrible issue.
April 22, 2014 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Human trafficking is a form of modern-day slavery where people profit from the control and exploitation of others. Millions of people are victimized throughout the world—including the United States—and they can be found in restaurants, factories, fisheries, brothels, farms and homes. According to the state of California, trafficking represents a $32 billion industry, vying against drugs and illegal arms sales as the top international crime. International laws and rules to address human trafficking have been in place for decades, but new efforts are being made around the world to confront this terrible issue.
In the United States, laws and regulations have been passed or drafted that increase the requirements of businesses to address human trafficking in their operations and their supply chain. One example is California's Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 (SB 657), which seeks to increase manufacturer and retailer transparency regarding their efforts, to address the issues of slavery and human trafficking. Recently, Executive Order 13627 on “Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking in Persons in Federal Contracts (2012)” was signed. This led to the draft Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (DFAR), which propose requirements on all federal contracts, with further requirements on contracts in excess of $500,000 or $1 million outside the United States.
Businesses should address the risks of human trafficking regardless of legal enforcement. For many companies, the greater risks are likely to be in the supply chain. A supply chain responsibility program should drive efforts to ensure and verify there is no bonded, child, forced, indentured or involuntary prison labor in the development and manufacturing of products and services. Hewlett-Packard (HP) has worked with its industry to integrate standards into the industry's code of conduct and supply chain-auditing protocols. Specific efforts include on-site auditing, specialized standards and assessments as well as supplier training and capability building.
Although HP has been working on advancing supply chain responsibility for many years, our industry is characterized by a shifting worker base that includes categories of workers who are at high risk for mistreatment. These include migrants, students, temporary workers and women. As an example, through HP's auditing and review processes, we noticed a significant increase in the use of student workers by electronics company suppliers. We also learned that some students were afraid to leave work for fear of not graduating from their vocational school, even though their internship was not always related to their studies. In response, HP developed leading student worker guidance for supplier facilities in China, which have since been adopted by our industry. Critical to these guidelines are a reinforcement that all work must be voluntary and that young workers engaging in a vocational internship should pursue work that is consistent with their field of study.
As visibility to the scale of human trafficking and modern-day slavery in the world continues to increase, and governments pursue measures to drive related awareness and due diligence, companies will need to continue to adapt their business practices, governance and supply chain management to ensure that they are not connected to such crimes. In the near future, we expect to see further requirements from governments and expectations from NGOs for supply chain transparency as well as increased reporting and auditing of company practices. The trafficking of persons is not acceptable in any industry, in any part of the world. While not the only vehicle for change, businesses, particularly when acting together with shared purpose, have a role to play in its successful prevention and remediation.
Human trafficking is a form of modern-day slavery where people profit from the control and exploitation of others. Millions of people are victimized throughout the world—including the United States—and they can be found in restaurants, factories, fisheries, brothels, farms and homes. According to the state of California, trafficking represents a $32 billion industry, vying against drugs and illegal arms sales as the top international crime. International laws and rules to address human trafficking have been in place for decades, but new efforts are being made around the world to confront this terrible issue.
In the United States, laws and regulations have been passed or drafted that increase the requirements of businesses to address human trafficking in their operations and their supply chain. One example is California's Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 (SB 657), which seeks to increase manufacturer and retailer transparency regarding their efforts, to address the issues of slavery and human trafficking. Recently, Executive Order 13627 on “Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking in Persons in Federal Contracts (2012)” was signed. This led to the draft Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (DFAR), which propose requirements on all federal contracts, with further requirements on contracts in excess of $500,000 or $1 million outside the United States.
Businesses should address the risks of human trafficking regardless of legal enforcement. For many companies, the greater risks are likely to be in the supply chain. A supply chain responsibility program should drive efforts to ensure and verify there is no bonded, child, forced, indentured or involuntary prison labor in the development and manufacturing of products and services.
Although HP has been working on advancing supply chain responsibility for many years, our industry is characterized by a shifting worker base that includes categories of workers who are at high risk for mistreatment. These include migrants, students, temporary workers and women. As an example, through HP's auditing and review processes, we noticed a significant increase in the use of student workers by electronics company suppliers. We also learned that some students were afraid to leave work for fear of not graduating from their vocational school, even though their internship was not always related to their studies. In response, HP developed leading student worker guidance for supplier facilities in China, which have since been adopted by our industry. Critical to these guidelines are a reinforcement that all work must be voluntary and that young workers engaging in a vocational internship should pursue work that is consistent with their field of study.
As visibility to the scale of human trafficking and modern-day slavery in the world continues to increase, and governments pursue measures to drive related awareness and due diligence, companies will need to continue to adapt their business practices, governance and supply chain management to ensure that they are not connected to such crimes. In the near future, we expect to see further requirements from governments and expectations from NGOs for supply chain transparency as well as increased reporting and auditing of company practices. The trafficking of persons is not acceptable in any industry, in any part of the world. While not the only vehicle for change, businesses, particularly when acting together with shared purpose, have a role to play in its successful prevention and remediation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250