How to provide the ultimate client experience
Weve learned through many client interviews that focusing on the client and what they are experiencing from us often comes down to behaviors related to responsiveness and exceeding client expectations.
May 21, 2014 at 08:00 PM
8 minute read
It's becoming increasingly difficult for one law firm to differentiate itself from another firm. Yet, if we take a look at those great brands who excel at customer/client experience, including Four Seasons, Disney and Ritz-Carlton, to name a few, we see that it takes an entire team at all levels to deliver on that promise. For a law firm, it means relying on those who “touch” clients the most to deliver on the promise, and the rest is icing on the proverbial cake.
Clients will tell us that they often begin to assess outstanding service during the business development process. One GC from a large pharmaceutical company stated, “If they show me they can deliver on time and are responsive throughout the sales process, I can usually get a good feel for what they will be like to work with.”
In addition, he offered some other tips for how to demonstrate outstanding client service, including:
-
Communicate: Don't just keep me informed about what is happening, but communicate to me the range of options, the cost and consequences of those options, and estimate the likelihood of success and the likelihood of getting me to outcomes I desire.
-
Be proactive: Honesty and realism are also very critical.
-
Keep me informed: If I'm not an expert in the area of the litigation, for example, speak in lay-friendly terms and teach me the information I need to know so I can make an informed decision.
-
Distill complex issues: I need to communicate to our CEO and our board; it helps to help me shape those communications.
-
Be courteous: When I see outside counsel talking down to my team, I know I have other options and won't use them again no matter how good they are. There should be a seamless relationship between us and them. It's amazing how often this is a problem.
-
Keep us involved with case strategy: Our previous counsel did not communicate well and did not involve us with strategy. So I've moved on from them. There are many fine, experienced practitioners today, and it's still the simple things that retain relationships.
Scott Slavick, chair of the client service committee at IP powerhouse Brinks Gilson Lione, shared these similar views from the law firm side: “We've learned through many client interviews that focusing on the client and what they are experiencing from us often comes down to behaviors related to responsiveness and exceeding client expectations. Sometimes it's the simple things that are most difficult to deliver on.”
Client service also means assisting clients with cost containment. The more specifically outside counsel is able to outline each task and the closer we can get to an accurate and realistic cost estimate, the better. In addition, the further out we can alert clients to unexpected costs, the more they appreciate it. Knowing the pressures, especially economic ones, that your clients are under is invaluable.
Responsiveness is an area that inside counsel continue to stress is critical to their relationships with outside counsel. What is responsive? Returning calls within an hour (even if you are away and it is your assistant acknowledging you are aware of the call and will call at a specified time) is responsive. It is wise to strive to answer the phone anytime a client calls. When it comes to email, a message should be acknowledged within minutes and substantive response should be provided within an hour or two. Clients really appreciate being able to pick up the phone and feel confident that they can reach outside counsel. In addition, with the increased use of social media, real-time problems and real-time answers have taken on even more importance. Connecting immediately when there is an issue is critical to business and to protecting shareholder value.
Service is what firms are selling. How can you “out service” your competition?
It's becoming increasingly difficult for one law firm to differentiate itself from another firm. Yet, if we take a look at those great brands who excel at customer/client experience, including Four Seasons, Disney and Ritz-Carlton, to name a few, we see that it takes an entire team at all levels to deliver on that promise. For a law firm, it means relying on those who “touch” clients the most to deliver on the promise, and the rest is icing on the proverbial cake.
Clients will tell us that they often begin to assess outstanding service during the business development process. One GC from a large pharmaceutical company stated, “If they show me they can deliver on time and are responsive throughout the sales process, I can usually get a good feel for what they will be like to work with.”
In addition, he offered some other tips for how to demonstrate outstanding client service, including:
-
Communicate: Don't just keep me informed about what is happening, but communicate to me the range of options, the cost and consequences of those options, and estimate the likelihood of success and the likelihood of getting me to outcomes I desire.
-
Be proactive: Honesty and realism are also very critical.
-
Keep me informed: If I'm not an expert in the area of the litigation, for example, speak in lay-friendly terms and teach me the information I need to know so I can make an informed decision.
-
Distill complex issues: I need to communicate to our CEO and our board; it helps to help me shape those communications.
-
Be courteous: When I see outside counsel talking down to my team, I know I have other options and won't use them again no matter how good they are. There should be a seamless relationship between us and them. It's amazing how often this is a problem.
-
Keep us involved with case strategy: Our previous counsel did not communicate well and did not involve us with strategy. So I've moved on from them. There are many fine, experienced practitioners today, and it's still the simple things that retain relationships.
Scott Slavick, chair of the client service committee at IP powerhouse
Client service also means assisting clients with cost containment. The more specifically outside counsel is able to outline each task and the closer we can get to an accurate and realistic cost estimate, the better. In addition, the further out we can alert clients to unexpected costs, the more they appreciate it. Knowing the pressures, especially economic ones, that your clients are under is invaluable.
Responsiveness is an area that inside counsel continue to stress is critical to their relationships with outside counsel. What is responsive? Returning calls within an hour (even if you are away and it is your assistant acknowledging you are aware of the call and will call at a specified time) is responsive. It is wise to strive to answer the phone anytime a client calls. When it comes to email, a message should be acknowledged within minutes and substantive response should be provided within an hour or two. Clients really appreciate being able to pick up the phone and feel confident that they can reach outside counsel. In addition, with the increased use of social media, real-time problems and real-time answers have taken on even more importance. Connecting immediately when there is an issue is critical to business and to protecting shareholder value.
Service is what firms are selling. How can you “out service” your competition?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250