Taking e-billing to the next level with a service provider
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it.
May 21, 2014 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it. Legal departments using e-billing solutions have already seen the benefits of automation: faster, more efficient processing and the ability to identify billing anomalies more quickly. Even at a relatively basic level of e-billing usage, most legal departments are likely to see measurable improvements in these areas.
However, far greater strategic advantages await those who tap a capable third-party service provider for e-billing support. With the right help, e-billing enables legal spend analysis at both macro and micro levels, giving in-house legal teams the ability to manage outside counsel spend in new and better ways.
Good help isn't hard to find
Several capable service providers have appeared in recent years, giving in-house teams access to experienced guidance as well as “arms and legs” to do the work that will take them to the next level of value. Granted, some in-house teams can staff and manage effective e-billing support, but few can do so as effectively or efficiently as a specialist provider that does e-billing support for a living. Besides, internal legal headcount is better used to move complex legal work in-house, not to provide e-billing support, especially when other effective support options exist.
Standardization and ongoing support
Streamlining and automation depend on standardization. To take full advantage of e-billing, guidelines must be developed, documented and shared with outside counsel and followed by all parties. With many successful e-billing implementations under its belt, a good service provider will help your team formulate and document guidelines and best practices, train outside counsel on the use of your e-billing platform and provide the ongoing administrative support required to monitor and ensure guideline compliance.
To minimize background noise, tap your service provider to answer all first-line questions from outside counsel and vendors related to invoicing, new matter creation, timekeepers and invoice status. Not only will this spare your own internal team time-consuming minutiae, it will create a feedback loop that will help your service provider deliver better, more responsive training on how to use the tool.
Information is power
With standardization and an effective support team in place, you can use your service provider to unlock the next level of strategic value in e-billing: leveraging spend analytics and historical data to ensure the billing rate for each timekeeper is consistent with portfolio averages and the industry based on position, experience and location.
Several new software tools are now available that enable this kind of analysis, but as with any sophisticated technology, these tools come with a learning curve. Capable service providers are already experienced with these tools and are better prepared than most in-house teams to shoulder the work required to produce meaningful, useful analysis.
Balanced scorecards and business reviews
To put this analysis to use, your service provider can help prepare objective scorecards that combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of outside counsel performance. This information can then be shared with outside counsel partners in periodic business reviews to develop healthy collaborative dialogue about value alignment.
We also use our service provider to act as a neutral third-party facilitator for these discussions to help ensure the most objective and solution-focused tone possible, in line with the “legal ecosystem” approach about which I have written previously.
The journey awaits
Legal teams that have already achieved the first wave of benefits from e-billing should now set their sights on the next level of returns. By engaging a capable service provider, legal teams can achieve greater standardization, efficiency, billing compliance and budget predictability, and can use billing information to foster better, more value-based relationships with outside counsel.
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it. Legal departments using e-billing solutions have already seen the benefits of automation: faster, more efficient processing and the ability to identify billing anomalies more quickly. Even at a relatively basic level of e-billing usage, most legal departments are likely to see measurable improvements in these areas.
However, far greater strategic advantages await those who tap a capable third-party service provider for e-billing support. With the right help, e-billing enables legal spend analysis at both macro and micro levels, giving in-house legal teams the ability to manage outside counsel spend in new and better ways.
Good help isn't hard to find
Several capable service providers have appeared in recent years, giving in-house teams access to experienced guidance as well as “arms and legs” to do the work that will take them to the next level of value. Granted, some in-house teams can staff and manage effective e-billing support, but few can do so as effectively or efficiently as a specialist provider that does e-billing support for a living. Besides, internal legal headcount is better used to move complex legal work in-house, not to provide e-billing support, especially when other effective support options exist.
Standardization and ongoing support
Streamlining and automation depend on standardization. To take full advantage of e-billing, guidelines must be developed, documented and shared with outside counsel and followed by all parties. With many successful e-billing implementations under its belt, a good service provider will help your team formulate and document guidelines and best practices, train outside counsel on the use of your e-billing platform and provide the ongoing administrative support required to monitor and ensure guideline compliance.
To minimize background noise, tap your service provider to answer all first-line questions from outside counsel and vendors related to invoicing, new matter creation, timekeepers and invoice status. Not only will this spare your own internal team time-consuming minutiae, it will create a feedback loop that will help your service provider deliver better, more responsive training on how to use the tool.
Information is power
With standardization and an effective support team in place, you can use your service provider to unlock the next level of strategic value in e-billing: leveraging spend analytics and historical data to ensure the billing rate for each timekeeper is consistent with portfolio averages and the industry based on position, experience and location.
Several new software tools are now available that enable this kind of analysis, but as with any sophisticated technology, these tools come with a learning curve. Capable service providers are already experienced with these tools and are better prepared than most in-house teams to shoulder the work required to produce meaningful, useful analysis.
Balanced scorecards and business reviews
To put this analysis to use, your service provider can help prepare objective scorecards that combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of outside counsel performance. This information can then be shared with outside counsel partners in periodic business reviews to develop healthy collaborative dialogue about value alignment.
We also use our service provider to act as a neutral third-party facilitator for these discussions to help ensure the most objective and solution-focused tone possible, in line with the “legal ecosystem” approach about which I have written previously.
The journey awaits
Legal teams that have already achieved the first wave of benefits from e-billing should now set their sights on the next level of returns. By engaging a capable service provider, legal teams can achieve greater standardization, efficiency, billing compliance and budget predictability, and can use billing information to foster better, more value-based relationships with outside counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250