Taking e-billing to the next level with a service provider
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it.
May 21, 2014 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it. Legal departments using e-billing solutions have already seen the benefits of automation: faster, more efficient processing and the ability to identify billing anomalies more quickly. Even at a relatively basic level of e-billing usage, most legal departments are likely to see measurable improvements in these areas.
However, far greater strategic advantages await those who tap a capable third-party service provider for e-billing support. With the right help, e-billing enables legal spend analysis at both macro and micro levels, giving in-house legal teams the ability to manage outside counsel spend in new and better ways.
Good help isn't hard to find
Several capable service providers have appeared in recent years, giving in-house teams access to experienced guidance as well as “arms and legs” to do the work that will take them to the next level of value. Granted, some in-house teams can staff and manage effective e-billing support, but few can do so as effectively or efficiently as a specialist provider that does e-billing support for a living. Besides, internal legal headcount is better used to move complex legal work in-house, not to provide e-billing support, especially when other effective support options exist.
Standardization and ongoing support
Streamlining and automation depend on standardization. To take full advantage of e-billing, guidelines must be developed, documented and shared with outside counsel and followed by all parties. With many successful e-billing implementations under its belt, a good service provider will help your team formulate and document guidelines and best practices, train outside counsel on the use of your e-billing platform and provide the ongoing administrative support required to monitor and ensure guideline compliance.
To minimize background noise, tap your service provider to answer all first-line questions from outside counsel and vendors related to invoicing, new matter creation, timekeepers and invoice status. Not only will this spare your own internal team time-consuming minutiae, it will create a feedback loop that will help your service provider deliver better, more responsive training on how to use the tool.
Information is power
With standardization and an effective support team in place, you can use your service provider to unlock the next level of strategic value in e-billing: leveraging spend analytics and historical data to ensure the billing rate for each timekeeper is consistent with portfolio averages and the industry based on position, experience and location.
Several new software tools are now available that enable this kind of analysis, but as with any sophisticated technology, these tools come with a learning curve. Capable service providers are already experienced with these tools and are better prepared than most in-house teams to shoulder the work required to produce meaningful, useful analysis.
Balanced scorecards and business reviews
To put this analysis to use, your service provider can help prepare objective scorecards that combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of outside counsel performance. This information can then be shared with outside counsel partners in periodic business reviews to develop healthy collaborative dialogue about value alignment.
We also use our service provider to act as a neutral third-party facilitator for these discussions to help ensure the most objective and solution-focused tone possible, in line with the “legal ecosystem” approach about which I have written previously.
The journey awaits
Legal teams that have already achieved the first wave of benefits from e-billing should now set their sights on the next level of returns. By engaging a capable service provider, legal teams can achieve greater standardization, efficiency, billing compliance and budget predictability, and can use billing information to foster better, more value-based relationships with outside counsel.
In the same way that it's hard to remember life before email, legal teams that have implemented electronic billing are already wondering how they ever functioned without it. Legal departments using e-billing solutions have already seen the benefits of automation: faster, more efficient processing and the ability to identify billing anomalies more quickly. Even at a relatively basic level of e-billing usage, most legal departments are likely to see measurable improvements in these areas.
However, far greater strategic advantages await those who tap a capable third-party service provider for e-billing support. With the right help, e-billing enables legal spend analysis at both macro and micro levels, giving in-house legal teams the ability to manage outside counsel spend in new and better ways.
Good help isn't hard to find
Several capable service providers have appeared in recent years, giving in-house teams access to experienced guidance as well as “arms and legs” to do the work that will take them to the next level of value. Granted, some in-house teams can staff and manage effective e-billing support, but few can do so as effectively or efficiently as a specialist provider that does e-billing support for a living. Besides, internal legal headcount is better used to move complex legal work in-house, not to provide e-billing support, especially when other effective support options exist.
Standardization and ongoing support
Streamlining and automation depend on standardization. To take full advantage of e-billing, guidelines must be developed, documented and shared with outside counsel and followed by all parties. With many successful e-billing implementations under its belt, a good service provider will help your team formulate and document guidelines and best practices, train outside counsel on the use of your e-billing platform and provide the ongoing administrative support required to monitor and ensure guideline compliance.
To minimize background noise, tap your service provider to answer all first-line questions from outside counsel and vendors related to invoicing, new matter creation, timekeepers and invoice status. Not only will this spare your own internal team time-consuming minutiae, it will create a feedback loop that will help your service provider deliver better, more responsive training on how to use the tool.
Information is power
With standardization and an effective support team in place, you can use your service provider to unlock the next level of strategic value in e-billing: leveraging spend analytics and historical data to ensure the billing rate for each timekeeper is consistent with portfolio averages and the industry based on position, experience and location.
Several new software tools are now available that enable this kind of analysis, but as with any sophisticated technology, these tools come with a learning curve. Capable service providers are already experienced with these tools and are better prepared than most in-house teams to shoulder the work required to produce meaningful, useful analysis.
Balanced scorecards and business reviews
To put this analysis to use, your service provider can help prepare objective scorecards that combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of outside counsel performance. This information can then be shared with outside counsel partners in periodic business reviews to develop healthy collaborative dialogue about value alignment.
We also use our service provider to act as a neutral third-party facilitator for these discussions to help ensure the most objective and solution-focused tone possible, in line with the “legal ecosystem” approach about which I have written previously.
The journey awaits
Legal teams that have already achieved the first wave of benefits from e-billing should now set their sights on the next level of returns. By engaging a capable service provider, legal teams can achieve greater standardization, efficiency, billing compliance and budget predictability, and can use billing information to foster better, more value-based relationships with outside counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250