The next frontier of talent deployment
When making staff decisions, consider the benefit and cost savings that paralegals can afford. And with paralegals, be prepared to invest now to save on costs later.
May 21, 2014 at 08:00 PM
8 minute read
One of the more difficult professional development and training challenges for general counsel involves creating ways to deploy talented people at their highest and best levels. Developing a cadre of paralegals who can perform at an attorney level is one area that may yield efficient and productive results.
To learn more about a systematic approach to finding, onboarding and developing paralegals, I spoke with Mark Roellig, EVP and general counsel of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. Roellig's organization includes over 50 lawyers and 25 paralegals and other professionals, such as investigators and project managers. He recently shared his big picture view and ways to think about effective legal department function and developing talent.
-
Reduce outside counsel costs: Consider convergence programs, alternative fee arrangements and reassignment of work to the right firms/right lawyers. This includes bringing routine work in-house.
-
Manage in-house work: For in-house work, determine what should be done at what level to make the best use of lawyer and paralegal staff.
-
Continuously improve processes: Reviewing processes in the department can add efficiencies. Simple changes like streamlining document review steps will reduce staff time.
Our discussion then moved to how a legal department can get the most benefit from paralegals, and Roellig provided some more tips.
Hire the right paralegals
A college degree is important, and a paralegal certificate can be helpful, but experience and good character traits trump all. Roellig seeks people who, among other things, are smart, curious, high energy, good communicators, team players and have integrity. In addition, if the paralegal candidates have a business sense and financial acumen, their value to the legal team is even higher.
Onboard and invest
In addition to the basics of having a smartphone, computer and everything else they need on the first day, each new hire develops a 30/60/90 day plan—preferably before the start date. Paralegals are assigned a mentor, an experienced paralegal in a different practice area. This provides a relationship for questions and feedback.
At Mass Mutual, paralegals reside in one of the major legal teams, such as corporate, insurance, litigation or retirement services. Tools and training are provided early to help the paralegals learn the business, the company, their specific areas of responsibility and the relevant legal issues. They also need to learn to communicate effectively within the legal function and with the business people.
Roellig believes that paralegals can often do the same level of work that a 2nd to 4th year associates might do. However, for paralegals to perform at that level, the GC needs to put in the time, energy and money to train them. Internal and external seminars and on-the-job training, along with mentoring, provides the tools.
One way to take advantage of having strongly trained paralegals is to have them fill in for, and even take responsibility for, a lawyer when the team is short-staffed, or a lawyer retires or moves on. While there is no substitute for legal experience, many of the tasks lawyers do can be done by paralegals. Roellig suggests hiring one or more paralegals before there is a specific need. They cannot be expected to get up to speed without a significant amount of time and experience. Investing the time today can help them be ready when the need is there. Over time, the department may be able to operate with fewer lawyers and more paralegals, or use even less outside counsel.
Give them the right work
Paralegals at Mass Mutual have substantial responsibility. They review and manage outside counsel bills, manage discovery, produce board packages and prepare solid draft documents such as 8Ks and proxy statements for review. They are internal client facing or work with insurance agents. A team of paralegals addresses insurance agent questions without having to consult with lawyers.
Lawyer or paralegal?
When making staff decisions, consider the benefit and cost savings that paralegals can afford. And with paralegals, be prepared to invest now to save on costs later.
One of the more difficult professional development and training challenges for general counsel involves creating ways to deploy talented people at their highest and best levels. Developing a cadre of paralegals who can perform at an attorney level is one area that may yield efficient and productive results.
To learn more about a systematic approach to finding, onboarding and developing paralegals, I spoke with Mark Roellig, EVP and general counsel of
-
Reduce outside counsel costs: Consider convergence programs, alternative fee arrangements and reassignment of work to the right firms/right lawyers. This includes bringing routine work in-house.
-
Manage in-house work: For in-house work, determine what should be done at what level to make the best use of lawyer and paralegal staff.
-
Continuously improve processes: Reviewing processes in the department can add efficiencies. Simple changes like streamlining document review steps will reduce staff time.
Our discussion then moved to how a legal department can get the most benefit from paralegals, and Roellig provided some more tips.
Hire the right paralegals
A college degree is important, and a paralegal certificate can be helpful, but experience and good character traits trump all. Roellig seeks people who, among other things, are smart, curious, high energy, good communicators, team players and have integrity. In addition, if the paralegal candidates have a business sense and financial acumen, their value to the legal team is even higher.
Onboard and invest
In addition to the basics of having a smartphone, computer and everything else they need on the first day, each new hire develops a 30/60/90 day plan—preferably before the start date. Paralegals are assigned a mentor, an experienced paralegal in a different practice area. This provides a relationship for questions and feedback.
At Mass Mutual, paralegals reside in one of the major legal teams, such as corporate, insurance, litigation or retirement services. Tools and training are provided early to help the paralegals learn the business, the company, their specific areas of responsibility and the relevant legal issues. They also need to learn to communicate effectively within the legal function and with the business people.
Roellig believes that paralegals can often do the same level of work that a 2nd to 4th year associates might do. However, for paralegals to perform at that level, the GC needs to put in the time, energy and money to train them. Internal and external seminars and on-the-job training, along with mentoring, provides the tools.
One way to take advantage of having strongly trained paralegals is to have them fill in for, and even take responsibility for, a lawyer when the team is short-staffed, or a lawyer retires or moves on. While there is no substitute for legal experience, many of the tasks lawyers do can be done by paralegals. Roellig suggests hiring one or more paralegals before there is a specific need. They cannot be expected to get up to speed without a significant amount of time and experience. Investing the time today can help them be ready when the need is there. Over time, the department may be able to operate with fewer lawyers and more paralegals, or use even less outside counsel.
Give them the right work
Paralegals at Mass Mutual have substantial responsibility. They review and manage outside counsel bills, manage discovery, produce board packages and prepare solid draft documents such as 8Ks and proxy statements for review. They are internal client facing or work with insurance agents. A team of paralegals addresses insurance agent questions without having to consult with lawyers.
Lawyer or paralegal?
When making staff decisions, consider the benefit and cost savings that paralegals can afford. And with paralegals, be prepared to invest now to save on costs later.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250