How M&A Is Going High-Tech
Technology is changing the way in which businesses conduct their mergers and acquisitions.
April 24, 2015 at 09:42 AM
2 minute read
Technology isn't just causing data breaches or social media faux pas for your company. It's also changing the way in which businesses conduct their mergers and acquisitions, according to Sara Josselyn of Norton Rose Fulbright in a recent post.
“Technological advancements such as online data rooms, corporate search services and information databases have increased the speed at which deals are made,” she says, relying on a recent report from Mergermarket Group entitled “Rebooting the Deal Process: How Technology is Changing the Art of M&A.” Here are some of her takeaways from the data:
- Access to Information: There is now more information accessible to the parties in a corporate transaction than ever before, giving them “insight on industry trends,” as well as helping to “narrow the gap on divisive issues,” explains Josselyn. “The proliferation of information technology has also served to level the playing field between the largest and smallest firms,” since all have access to the same information regardless of their size.
- Risks: The increase of information also presents risks, such as data leakage. “The use of technology to exchange and store data comes with the risk that this data will fall into the wrong hands,” she says, noting that publically traded companies with prominent public profiles are at particular risk.
- Limits: Although technology can affect deals, the research concedes “there is a distinctly human aspect of deal making.” In-person negotiations can help the parties identify interests and priorities. “It remains to be seen if technology can replace the handshake and the other distinctly human elements of M&A,” says Josselyn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Merger-Review Process Could Doom Some Deals, Add Headaches, Subjectivity to Others
7 minute readFTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute read$5.3 Billion Sale of MotoGP's Parent Hammered Out by Lawyers From Around Globe
Trending Stories
- 1AI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
- 2Attorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
- 3Shifting Battlegrounds in Administrative Law, From Biden to Trump II
- 4Bar Report - Jan. 13
- 5Newsmakers: Robert Collins, Barron Wallace Elected to Bracewell’s Management Committee
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250