Inside/Outside Counsel: Relationships mean everything
The end of the year is an especially good time of the year for inside and outside counsel to connect to obtain and provide useful feedback about the relationship and about the upcoming year's goals for the client business. Despite busy year-end calendars, clients appreciate the opportunity to have a...
December 31, 2015 at 07:00 PM
8 minute read
The end of the year is an especially good time of the year for inside and outside counsel to connect to obtain and provide useful feedback about the relationship and about the upcoming year's goals for the client business. Despite busy year-end calendars, clients appreciate the opportunity to have a year-end review, preferably initiated by their outside counsel.
For outside counsel, here is a straight-forward format for a year-end review, compliments of input from various in house counsel and our consultants:
Client service questions to consider:
-
How would you describe the relationship with us?
-
What would you consider the most important elements of a professional relationship?
-
Are there specific areas that we could improve?
-
How would you describe the quality of our work?
-
Regarding value, how do we compare to other law firms?
-
Would you suggest any changes?
Upcoming year planning questions to consider:
-
What are your top three priorities this year?
-
Can you describe your goals and objectives for the coming year?
-
What potential challenges does the company face?
-
Where do you see the business going in 1, 3 or 5 years?
-
What are the critical company initiatives for the upcoming year?
-
What growth opportunities do you foresee in the future?
-
What are the greatest challenges you're facing in the legal dept.?
-
What's currently working in the legal dept.? What's not?
-
How do you see using outside counsel to help you achieve your goals?
-
What criteria are used for selecting outside counsel?
We also asked clients if they had any advice for outside counsel for 2016 and here are some quick tips for strengthening the relationships:
-
As always, “understand our business” remains number one on the list. Meaning, not just what industry we are in but what is going on with the industry overall, what's happening with our suppliers and most of all what our big goals are for growth and for legal cost containment (senior litigation counsel, global investment advisory firm, N.Y.).
-
Please introduce us to the team members who work on our files. Seeing names on emails and billing reports of people we have not met reminds us the relationship with the firm has room for improvement (general counsel, technology company, Calif.).
-
Come tell us (based on 1 above) about other ways in which your firm may be of help to us. Don't assume we read your website. We always welcome discussion about how we may work further with the firm as long as it is a productive discussion and we can meet the lawyers (general counsel, global financial services firm, Mass.).
-
Make the effort to visit us at least annually. Especially if we are giving the firm work. If it's not worth the trip, maybe it's not worth having the relationship at all (general counsel, Europe, pharmaceutical company).
-
We really like our relationships with outside counsel and see them as part of our team (this one was mentioned by a few in-house counsel). Come visit and let us know what else is going on in our business world from your perspective and your work with other companies like ours.
-
If you have good talent who are not working out at your firm, (other than being a good lawyer which always comes first) then call us to ask us if we would be interested in having them as a member of our team. We look to hire good talent (IP counsel, medical device company, Calif.).
-
When it comes to value add, think outside the box. CLEs are great but so are other programs that help us with the business of law. (senior litigation counsel, health care provider, Minn.).
Upon reflection, most of these great tips are relationship-oriented and welcome opportunity to build new and strong relationships with clients throughout 2016 and beyond.
The end of the year is an especially good time of the year for inside and outside counsel to connect to obtain and provide useful feedback about the relationship and about the upcoming year's goals for the client business. Despite busy year-end calendars, clients appreciate the opportunity to have a year-end review, preferably initiated by their outside counsel.
For outside counsel, here is a straight-forward format for a year-end review, compliments of input from various in house counsel and our consultants:
Client service questions to consider:
-
How would you describe the relationship with us?
-
What would you consider the most important elements of a professional relationship?
-
Are there specific areas that we could improve?
-
How would you describe the quality of our work?
-
Regarding value, how do we compare to other law firms?
-
Would you suggest any changes?
Upcoming year planning questions to consider:
-
What are your top three priorities this year?
-
Can you describe your goals and objectives for the coming year?
-
What potential challenges does the company face?
-
Where do you see the business going in 1, 3 or 5 years?
-
What are the critical company initiatives for the upcoming year?
-
What growth opportunities do you foresee in the future?
-
What are the greatest challenges you're facing in the legal dept.?
-
What's currently working in the legal dept.? What's not?
-
How do you see using outside counsel to help you achieve your goals?
-
What criteria are used for selecting outside counsel?
We also asked clients if they had any advice for outside counsel for 2016 and here are some quick tips for strengthening the relationships:
-
As always, “understand our business” remains number one on the list. Meaning, not just what industry we are in but what is going on with the industry overall, what's happening with our suppliers and most of all what our big goals are for growth and for legal cost containment (senior litigation counsel, global investment advisory firm, N.Y.).
-
Please introduce us to the team members who work on our files. Seeing names on emails and billing reports of people we have not met reminds us the relationship with the firm has room for improvement (general counsel, technology company, Calif.).
-
Come tell us (based on 1 above) about other ways in which your firm may be of help to us. Don't assume we read your website. We always welcome discussion about how we may work further with the firm as long as it is a productive discussion and we can meet the lawyers (general counsel, global financial services firm, Mass.).
-
Make the effort to visit us at least annually. Especially if we are giving the firm work. If it's not worth the trip, maybe it's not worth having the relationship at all (general counsel, Europe, pharmaceutical company).
-
We really like our relationships with outside counsel and see them as part of our team (this one was mentioned by a few in-house counsel). Come visit and let us know what else is going on in our business world from your perspective and your work with other companies like ours.
-
If you have good talent who are not working out at your firm, (other than being a good lawyer which always comes first) then call us to ask us if we would be interested in having them as a member of our team. We look to hire good talent (IP counsel, medical device company, Calif.).
-
When it comes to value add, think outside the box. CLEs are great but so are other programs that help us with the business of law. (senior litigation counsel, health care provider, Minn.).
Upon reflection, most of these great tips are relationship-oriented and welcome opportunity to build new and strong relationships with clients throughout 2016 and beyond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readFOMO Run Amok? Resolve of Firms Chasing AI Dreams Tested by Sky-High Costs
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 2California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 3New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 4Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 5To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250