Keeping to ourselves
Welcome, readers, to 2016. We hope you had a nice holiday season. Do you feel rested? Good. Youre going to need all that stored-up energy you can muster for the upcoming year.
December 31, 2015 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
Welcome, readers, to 2016. We hope you had a nice holiday season. Do you feel rested? Good. You're going to need all that stored-up energy you can muster for the upcoming year.
First, inside counsel will have the usual menu of issues: cost containment, managing outside counsel, labor and employment matters, regulatory changes (thank you, Paris delegates, for adding a note of uncertainty. But life would be dull otherwise, wouldn't it?).
Then there are other more pressing issues, the salesman's “incentive” in Nairobi, the engineers who find a way to cheat on emissions tests, that sort of thing.
But there's one thing that keeps muscling out the other issues, taking control of newspaper headlines when Donald Trump takes a day off: data privacy. Yes, it was lurking in the background for years. But hackers weren't as good, putting personal data wasn't as pervasive a practice as it is now, and the “Internet of things” was merely a vision of future-thinking software engineers.
It took what was the biggest data breach of all to bring the issue to the forefront. Call Edward Snowden a hacker, a criminal, a whistleblower, a hero, or a combination of all three, but he and groups like Wikileaks focused the collective consciousness on data security and spilled secrets like no others.
So what's that mean to general counsel and their legal department colleagues? Well, somehow in-house lawyers got tasked with yet learning another skill, that of how their companies and organizations gather and store data. They've had to come up to speed on network servers, where the clouds actually reside, and where the vulnerabilities exist. With data breaches happening at regular intervals, knowing all this comes in handy.
Plus, there are different levels of privacy. With clashing protection levels across the globe, today's in-house counsel needs to keep dozens of privacy regulations in mind.
You can read lofty discussions of data privacy and breaches elsewhere. In this issue, we try to bring you some real, actionable information on how to approach data privacy and how your legal department and company can protect the privacy of your clients, vendors and customers.
On a housekeeping level, we welcome Stephanie Forshee to the masthead. She comes to us from Seattle and the Puget Business Journal, where she reported on local business doings and legal affairs. And Lisa Shuchman from our affiliate Corporate Counsel contributed a feature on intellectual property that's worth a read. With the proliferation of inversions, like that of Pfizer and Allergan, U.S. lawmakers are scrambling to carve out tax breaks for IP and research, in the hopes of keeping U.S. knowhow—and jobs—in the U.S.
It's going to be an interesting year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
AT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
How Gen AI Is Changing Legal Work for In-House Counsel
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250