Amid Marketing Overload, Law Firms Keep Content Coming
Consider a variation on the old tree-falling-in-the-forest puzzle: If a lawyer posts a blog entry and no one reads it, does her law firm have an effective…
June 01, 2017 at 08:19 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Consider a variation on the old tree-falling-in-the-forest puzzle: If a lawyer posts a blog entry and no one reads it, does her law firm have an effective content marketing strategy?
The answer is no, according to the authors of a new report on the state of legal marketing released this week.
First conducted in 2010, the State of Digital & Content Marketing Survey this year included responses from 114 in-house lawyers and 53 law firm marketing professionals.
Public relations firm Greentarget and law firm management consultancy Zeughauser Group sponsored the polling, which was conducted in the first quarter of 2017.
“We wanted to learn whether—and the extent to which—in-house counsel feel overwhelmed by the content and information coming at them each day. And we hoped to better understand the degree to which law firms might be contributing to the problem,” John Corey, Greentarget's president, wrote in the report's introduction.
The researchers found that information overload is indeed a problem for in-house lawyers, but law firms have nevertheless increased the amount of content they produce—and they plan to increase it even further this year.
The vast majority of law firms have failed to develop and articulate effective strategies for ensuring that their targeted audience consume their content, the study concluded.
According to the report:
- -Ninety-six percent of in-house counsel said information overload about business, industry and legal topics is a problem, and 76 percent said it is a big or somewhat of a problem.
- -Some 81 percent of law firm marketers, however, said they will produce more content in 2017 than in 2016. “None say they will produce less—just as in our 2015 survey. Further, 98 percent say their content budgets for 2017 remained the same or increased from 2016, also tracking our 2015 findings,” the authors stated.
- -Law firms are behind the curve when it comes to having a concrete marketing strategy. The Content Marketing Institute found that 37 percent of business-to-business organizations have a documented strategy. That compares with only 26 percent of law firm marketing representatives included in Wednesday's survey.
What can law firms do to make sure the increasing amount of content they produce gets consumed by the targeted audiences?
Firms should set “distinct and measurable goals,” Corey said. That starts with determining the purpose of their content, devising where and how to present it, and then designating actions for all stakeholders at the firm to take, he said.
But even then, the marketing teams need to recognize a simple truth about their firm's clients, Corey said: “They are not going to be able to consume everything you are sending them.”
Copyright The American Lawyer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1GC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
- 2Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
- 3Feds Chide Defense Attorney Alex Spiro for Extrajudicial Comments in NYC's Adams Case
- 4These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
- 5‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250