The Future of Big Data and Intellectual Property
IP data is uniquely suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes.The intellectual…
June 13, 2017 at 06:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
IP data is uniquely suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes.
The intellectual property space is becoming increasingly competitive and organizations that create IP have a smaller window than ever before to ensure it is protected and exploited internationally. IP data is suited for big data tools and techniques because of its high volume, high variety, and high velocity of changes. And, IP departments can apply larger data sets and smarter analytics to drive value in the creation and protection of IP.
Simon Webster, CEO at CPA Global, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss how big data tools and technologies can be used in the patent world to drastically improve patent analysis – from how behavioural analysis can reveal the likelihood of patent issuance during prosecution to international IP portfolio management.
Today, big data is important when it comes to IP because it can help better decision making. In fact, up to 85 percent of a company's value lies in its IP portfolio and it is often a key driver in the most high-profile acquisitions and mergers. Almost every company can improve its efficiency through modern technologies to drive increased insight through big data.
“Companies used to struggle to gain the required insight from data that helped them make better strategic decisions,” he said. “With the availability of on demand computing and storage and the application of artificial intelligence to process vast volumes of data quickly, all businesses are now looking for insight that can help shape company direction.”
For example, a supermarket might analyse sales patterns against the weather to see if certain products are more popular in warmer weather – they can then use this to more accurately manage stock. Companies can gain access to data on around 100 million patents across 100 different jurisdictions. Insight from this data provides the capability for companies and law firms to understand more about who owns which patents.
“If you imagine a world where future research and development direction is shaped by real data about IP strengths and weaknesses within a company, you have some idea how big data can help companies with IP issues,” said Webster.
However, these days, organizations that create IP have a smaller window to ensure it is protected and exploited internationally because of digitization, per Webster. In 1955 the first McDonalds restaurant opened in the U.S and it took 12 years for the company to open its first overseas restaurant. Even then, it was in the nearest country – geographically and culturally – to its home market: Canada. The 12-year time frame provided the brand with plenty of time to establish itself in its home market, plan a strategy of growth and execute. Additionally, Facebook is currently 12 years old – the same age that McDonalds was when it opened its first overseas fast food restaurant. But, Facebook operates in virtually every country, has almost two billion active users and a brand value of more than $50 billion.
“In a digital environment, this timescale is unthinkable – companies and industries are destroyed in a fraction of that time,” he explained. “Every business anywhere in the world is a global business from the moment it has a website. The business environment has sped up and will continue to do so. Businesses therefore must protect their ideas more quickly and effectively on a global basis to gain the maximum benefit from ideas generation.”
IP data can shape investment decisions in research and development, help companies understand their relative strengths and weaknesses against their competitors and enable them to understand more about the potential opportunities in new markets, according to Webster.
“Every industry is facing opportunities and threats from different geographies, adjacent industries and game changing technologies,” said Webster. “Companies have less time to react to this environment. Strategic business planning on an ongoing basis relies on insight into a complex data set of changing information and analytics within IP data sources can help ensure better business decisions.”
Now, the most advanced corporations are combining internal data on their most profitable patents with external data on new markets to understand where opportunities might exist around the globe to launch new products and monetise more of their IP. This helps with business planning and growth strategies as well as managing investment costs of globalising products more efficiently.
“The tools are here today, with further advanced applications being deployed in a matter of months,” he explained. “Companies that are still manually searching for relevant IP information are not only having to deploy resources that are less efficient, they are also missing the critical business insight that comes from connecting disparate data sets.”
These days, the resources available to the IP professional go wider and deeper than ever before and offer the opportunity to make much more informed decisions around their current and future IP portfolio. But, the real transformation comes in the impact that access to relevant data has for how a business grows and develops over time – impacting diverse areas such as investment strategy, global growth and product development.
He added, “The argument for IP Officers to be an integral part of the entire business planning and development process has never been stronger. Armed with insight, driven from internal and external data, analysed effectively, IP professionals can extend their reach beyond the IP department and more fully shape boardroom strategy.”
Further reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMyriad Genetics Hires NIH Scientist-Turned-Biopharma Lawyer as Legal Chief
Patent Data Unicorn Names First GC, Hiring From Another AI-Driven Unicorn
3 minute readMeta Transfers AI-Related Patents to Midjourney to Thwart Patent Trolls
Google, HP Alum Hired as GC of Startup Bringing AI to Classrooms
Trending Stories
- 1‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 2Gertrude Stein Is Right On Again
- 3Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench
- 4The End of Innocence? DEP’s End Run Around ‘All Appropriate Inquiry’ Spill Act Protections
- 5Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250