After Covington Report, Busier Times Ahead for Uber's Legal Department
A three-month investigation into the corporate culture at Uber Technologies Inc. culminated Tuesday at an all-hands meeting with the release…
June 16, 2017 at 11:36 AM
6 minute read
A three-month investigation into the corporate culture at Uber Technologies Inc. culminated Tuesday at an all-hands meeting with the release of a 13-page document of recommendations on how to move the San Francisco-based ride-hailing giant forward. Though there were a few distractions–such as CEO Travis Kalanick's announcement that he's taking personal leave–focus seemed to be on how the embattled company can fix its culture and repair its reputation.
Uber's legal department is named only a few times in the report, but lawyers and consultants unaffiliated with the company believe Uber's in-house counsel will play a large part in addressing the recommendations. And a former Uber in-house attorney who spoke to Corporate Counsel expressed confidence based on past experience that the company will make progress.
The report released Tuesday is the result of an investigation led by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and fellow Covington & Burling partner Tammy Albarrán. It stems from a February blog post by former Uber engineer Susan Fowler Rigetti that portrayed the company's work culture as biased against women and alleged that managers ignored sexual harassment complaints.
The recommendations in the report, which were unanimously approved by Uber's board of directors, include rethinking governance and leadership, improving training across the company and making changes to personnel and practices in the human resources department.
In response to request for comment, an Uber spokesperson directed Corporate Counsel to the company's online newsroom. Uber chief HR officer Liane Hornsey said in a statement posted there that “implementing these recommendations will improve our culture, promote fairness and accountability, and establish processes and systems to ensure the mistakes of the past will not be repeated.”
|What Happens Next?
A former in-house attorney at Uber who requested anonymity in order to preserve relationships with Uber and former colleagues there is confident current employees will keep management accountable and demand a healthier work culture moving forward. Although, the source said, admittedly, it will not happen overnight.
The main reason for the source's confidence in the impact of the report is that the former employee saw a turnaround once before as the result of an investigation conducted on Uber's behalf.
Uber previously hired law firm Hogan Lovells to conduct an investigation, completed in January 2015, into the company's privacy policies after reports surfaced that Uber had tracked movementsof customers, targeting celebrities, politicians and journalists specifically, using its “God View” tool.
The former attorney was employed by Uber at the time and said that changes were substantial as a result of Hogan's investigation. “Uber's privacy policies … really did need to be revamped at the time and the company took the recommendations very seriously and implemented them,” the source said. “From a privacy standpoint, I think we were a much better company as a result of that process.”
The source, who was still working at Uber when Fowler Rigetti's blog post was published, said “there were a lot of people who were extremely upset inside the company who were demanding changes as a result of those allegations.”
The source noted that employees were accustomed to hearing allegations in the news made by competitors against Uber, but Fowler Rigetti's claims were something many colleagues “took very seriously.”
“I think just a lot of people were upset the … alleged treatment of her didn't reflect Uber's values. … Pretty quickly, management understood that this was a really serious problem and took a lot of measures to address the issue as quickly as possible,” the former Uber lawyer said.
The attorney speculated that based on what happened in 2015 as a result of Hogan's privacy report, lawyers might even be added to the legal department to specifically address the recommendations made in Covington's recent report.
“Who knows? There may be a new group that will be started in the legal department that focuses specifically on these issues,” the source said. “Given how much the employment team is already doing, that seems like a possibility.”
|Where to Begin
According to attorneys and legal consultants, Uber's in-house lawyers will need to step up in order to address the report's criticisms.
“[The legal department] needs to be at the epicenter of the new Uber,” said Richard Levick, chairman and CEO of public relations firm Levick. “The company seems to lack that nucleus that's so important from legal.”
The legal department, he said, needs to codify rules and procedures for working with HR and should be really clear about the hierarchy and who is in charge.
Rees Morrison, principal at legal consultancy Altman Weil, said Uber's legal department should consider how to track the company's progress on the Covington recommendations and immediately think about getting help from a specialty labor and employment outside counsel team.
Morrison added that Uber's in-house labor and employment attorneys are “going to be buried” in work as they create and review new policies.
Along with filling the vacancy created by former Uber general counsel Salle Yoo's recent move to the CLO seat, it may also be wise to add to the head count in the legal department, said Jon Klassen, corporate partner at firm Kunzler Law Group, who was previously executive vice president, general counsel and secretary at life science-focused real estate company BioMed Realty Trust Inc.
“There should be more that's escalated to the legal department. You're going to need more people to do that,” Klassen said. “I would be looking to hire people who have employment law expertise.”
Because the board sees the report's findings as important, said Eugene Illovsky, a former Morrison & Foerster partner who has a solo practice in corporate investigations, directors will ensure it is acted upon. He added that because many of the recommendations—such as policy creation and upkeep, new hiring and further integration of executives into the business—will require some legal work, Uber's lawyers will be directly involved.
“The legal department and the new GC working under the chief legal officer can play an important role in the organizational challenge of focusing and coordinating the efforts of all these new personnel, processes and committees that are going to come about as a result of the [Holder report],” Illovsky said.
Contact Stephanie Forshee at [email protected]. On Twitter:@InOtherNewsNow. Contact David Ruiz at [email protected]. On Twitter:@davidalruiz. Contact Jennifer Williams-Alvarez at [email protected]. On Twitter:@JenKayW
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readEx-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250