FTC Notifies Celebrities/Social Media Influencers of Its Endorsement Rules
About 45 celebrities were reportedly part of a group of 90 social media influencers who recently received letters from the Federal Trade Commission “educating” them about the government's advertising disclosure requirements.
July 03, 2017 at 08:16 AM
8 minute read
About 45 celebrities were reportedly part of a group of 90 social media influencers who recently received letters from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) “educating” them about the government's advertising disclosure requirements.
This was an issue that needed to be tackled, given that the dollar amount of endorsement contracts between brands and social media influencers—such as celebrities, athletes and reality stars—are reportedly as high as seven figures. Violating FTC advertising requirements could cost influencers and brands a lot of money—not to mention reputational injury. In the past, FTC enforcement of advertising rules was focused on brands, however social media influencers are increasingly on the FTC's radar as a result of the rise of Instagram and other social media platforms as marketing tools. Given the high financial stakes involved and the influencers' ability to reach millions of consumers, the FTC is keeping a close eye on influencers and their posts.
The FTC monitors advertising activities pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act, which charges the FTC with, among other things, preventing “unfair or deceptive acts or practices,” including advertising that is false or misleading in any material way. The FTC published the Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (also known as the Endorsement Guides) to provide guidance regarding how the FTC evaluates certain endorsements and testimonials in advertising.
According to the Endorsement Guides, if there is a “material connection” between an advertiser and an endorser, the connection must be “clearly and conspicuously disclosed, unless it is already clear from the context of the communication.” This applies to both advertisers and endorsers. A “material connection” is something that may affect how a consumer may assess the credibility of the endorsement, such as a close relationship, the gift of a free product, or a payment. In other words, if an endorser/influencer is paid by a brand and endorses the brand or its product(s) on social media, the influencer's followers should be made aware of such payment so the followers can evaluate how much weight to afford the influencer's (paid) endorsement of the product.
Complying with this requirement can be tricky due to social media's space constraints which can cause messages to be interpreted differently by consumers. So how should a material connection be disclosed? Following are a few guiding principles from the FTC that all brands and influencers should keep in mind:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInfluencers Putting Companies on Hot Seat by Demanding 'Reverse' Morals Clauses
8 minute readWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readFTC Decries Social Media Platforms' 'Vast Surveillance' of Users
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250