Prosecution agreements appear to be the tool of choice for federal prosecutors going after corporations, and are likely to remain the favorite tool for years to come, according to a new report from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
The “2017 Mid-Year Update on Corporate Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs) and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs),” released last week, analyzed the use of these agreements, which is becoming increasingly global. As previously reported, Canada, France and Australia are considering such agreements; Scotland is considering enhancements; and the United States and United Kingdom already use them.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
