New Immigration Regulation Implements the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act
On Jan. 17, 2017, a new immigration regulation went into effect, key provisions of which enhance an employer's ability to hire and retain foreign workers who are in the green card queue, who have recently been laid off by a prior employer, or who face compelling circumstances requiring them to seek new employment. The regulation also expands the ways nonprofits can demonstrate they are exempt from the annual H-1B quota.
July 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM
20 minute read
On Jan. 17, 2017, a new immigration regulation went into effect implementing aspects of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC-21). Signed into law in 2000, AC-21 aimed to address U.S. employers' inability to hire skilled personnel to meet the demands of the modern market. Pub. Law 106-313, 114 Stat. 1251 (Oct. 17, 2000). See also S. Rep. No. 106-260 at 2 (2000). The new regulation, titled “Retention of EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 Immigrant Workers and Program Improvements Affecting High-Skilled Nonimmigrant Workers,” 81 FR 82398 (Nov. 18, 2016), expands the ways U.S. employers can recruit and sponsor foreign professionals. This article will provide an overview of selected key provisions of the new regulation that enhance an employer's ability to hire and retain foreign workers who are in the U.S. permanent residence (“green card”) queue, who have recently been laid off by a prior employer, or who face compelling circumstances requiring them to seek new employment. The regulation also expands the ways nonprofits can demonstrate they are exempt from the annual H-1B quota.
Greater Flexibility When Recruiting Candidates Already in the Green Card Process
The green card quota system is complex, and depending on where an employee or their spouse was born, the type of job a U.S. employer sponsors him or her to fill, and the date an employer initiates the sponsorship process (the “priority date”), the wait for a green card can be extraordinarily long. Delays imposed by the quota system are often exacerbated by a requirement that the employer and employee intend for the employee to perform the job described in the employer's sponsorship petition (“immigrant petition”) as of the date the green card is approved, and for a reasonable time thereafter. 8 CFR 245.25(a)(3). This obligation can prevent sponsored employees from pursuing career growth through new job opportunities, including new positions with their green card sponsors. It can also inhibit employers from utilizing staff with advancing skills in new roles and deter them from recruiting foreign talent in the green card process with other employers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
8 minute readThe Layoffs Are Here: What It Means for Employees Holding H-1B Visas
3 minute readSheppard Mullin and Paul Hastings Partners Picked for DHS Leadership Roles
4 minute readIn Legal Departments, Work Volumes May Be Fluctuating Alongside Immigration Laws
Trending Stories
- 1The Fearless Forecaster’s Employment Law Predictions for 2025
- 2Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 3People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 4Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 5Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250