Corporate Trends Reshaping Legal Departments

The corporate world has never moved faster. According to a study published in the Harvard Business Review, one-in-three companies will be delisted in the…

August 07, 2017 at 05:10 PM

6 minute read

The original version of this story was published on Law.com


The corporate world has never moved faster. According to a study published in the Harvard Business Review, one-in-three companies will be delisted in the next five years. Companies need to constantly reinvent themselves, their products and their markets if they want to sustainably grow. But what does this world of rapid change mean for in-house legal departments?

Trends Impacting In-House Legal Departments

It's impossible to outline the full extent of changes impacting corporations—there are just too many. But there are a few trends that have dramatic consequences for how legal departments will need to transform in the years ahead.

  1. (1) Increasing Corporate Demand for Legal Services. As the volume of M&A increases, regulatory changes promulgate and a greater percentage of corporate wealth depends on a legal basis (e.g., intellectual property), the demand for legal services will only increase. We estimate that demand will increase 85 percent between 2016 and 2020, putting pressure on in-house legal departments to increase provision of cost-efficient legal services to the company.
  2. (2) Changing Client Consumption Patterns. As executives face an increasing array of decisions to be made, they need confidence that they are receiving the right set of information (or have the right way to distill information). In this world, legal departments need to “productize” their expertise so it can be consumed at the time when executives are making a decision. This means the way legal guidance is delivered to business clients must change. Increasingly, legal departments need to apply the user-centered design to their “customers” and embed guidance and self-service capabilities into workflows at the right decision points. This is the only way that legal can keep pace with and streamline enterprise decision-making and failing to do so may result in a firm-level drag on productivity.
  3. (3) Corporate Digitization and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Legal departments have not been bastions of innovation. Historical legal technologies have saved lawyers time by better organizing department work (e.g., matter management, e-billing), but they have never replaced the time-consuming effort of forming legal judgments. The advent of machine learning will change this dynamic. For the first time, it will be possible to “download” legally trained minds and bring them to scale. Legal's adoption of this technology will be important, as “analog” functions will become an increasing drag on corporate speed. Going forward, legal department productivity will depend on defining and codifying the algorithm of legal judgement.
  4. (4) Cybersecurity and Privacy. As the value of information increases, so too does its potential risks. In-house legal departments will find themselves on the front lines of cybersecurity and privacy concerns, interpreting regulatory mandates, consumer sentiment and working with Information Security. General Counsel, in conjunction with other corporate executives, will need to develop information governance policies and corporate data strategies for their companies. The organizations that can protect privacy and sensitive corporate information while simultaneously providing the business with strategic freedom and simple processes to confidently use data will gain a competitive advantage. 

Legal in 2020

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro