North Korea Cybersecurity Hackers Are After Money
As of late, there has been a significant change in the targets of the team of hackers out of North Korea as an increase in bank accounts have…
August 11, 2017 at 07:20 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As of late, there has been a significant change in the targets of the team of hackers out of North Korea as an increase in bank accounts have been hacked. Hackers used to focus their efforts on government agencies or companies in countries that it considered hostile, with the goal of obtaining secret information and causing social discord. But, financial attacks are what we should be looking out for now.
Some of the recent cyberattacks include the $81 million stolen from Bangladesh's central bank and an attempt at hacking Polish banks. While hackers have used cyberattacks in the past to gain information, the latest trend regarding targets suggests that the hacks are acting a source of funding as well.
Cybersecurity expert Roderick Jones, sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss the news trend in North Korea cybersecurity attacks. North Korea has a long history of using illicit means to acquire foreign currency. In the past, according to Jones, this has involved the large scale forgery of U.S. $100 bills as well as engaging in other traditional crime activities such as illicit gaming and counterfeiting.
“The need to operate in the black market comes from North Korea's trade isolation from the rest of the world, the cyber hacking of bank accounts is the latest manifestation of a long trend and we should expect to see more of it now U.N. sanctions have been tightened on the regime,” he explained. By focusing on companies and countries that are in opposition to the North Korean regime they can achieve two aims at once – raise funds and create instability in countries they consider to be their opponents.”
So, why are financial attacks what we should be looking out for now?
The North Korean's have up to now been focused on attacking global financial institutions and have had some successes. However, these returns will diminish as cyber security protections are increased in the global financial sector.
“There are few cyber-security protections around wealthy individuals and executives in the West and it seems likely that the North Korean hacking units will look at the successes organized crime groups have had against wealthy individuals and move in that direction,” he said.
In fact, the recent WannaCry attacks that used ransomware are now considered by some to have emanated from North Korea, disabling a big part of the health care system in the U.K., according to Jones. “This may have been an unintended consequence but it shows the physical application of cyber-war,” he said.
One of the most famous cyber-attacks remains the US attack against the Iranian nuclear program, known as Stuxnet. This is credited with slowing down the Iranian nuclear program and it's hard to imagine the US isn't using similar methods against North Korea to slow down its nuclear weapons program.
More and more, hackers are using hacking as a source of funding. Per Jones, whether they are aligned with a state or organized crime group, Hackers need to show revenues to continue to function. Since these operations run like businesses and are not funded by tax payer dollars, they operate a hybrid approach that sometimes involves hacking strategic targets and sometimes is simply designed to produce revenue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250