OCC Has Banking Sandbox-Like 'Pilot' for Fintechs in the Works
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is looking to launch what it calls a bank-run "pilot" that would help support financial technology companies,…
August 11, 2017 at 07:12 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is looking to launch what it calls a bank-run “pilot” that would help support financial technology companies, according to the federal banking regulator's chief counsel.
In her keynote address at the American Bar Association's annual meeting in New York Thursday, Amy Friend, senior deputy comptroller and chief counsel at the OCC, said the agency is exploring opportunities to create a regulatory sandbox, an environment in which companies can test new products and business models without worrying about the regulatory consequences.
Friend shared how the OCC's Office of Innovation has been researching how other agencies in the U.S. and abroad are embracing the financial technology sector. She pointed to the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., which has been held up as a global leader in the space, known for encouraging innovation.
U.S. regulators are increasingly expressing interest in engaging fintech companies as well. In May, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced the launch of LabCFTC, an initiative designed to give fintechs greater access to the commission and to encourage them to ask regulatory questions and offer feedback as to which regulations they find the most prohibitive. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had previously launched a similar initiative called Project Catalyst, where it invited fintech companies to participate in initiatives that inform the bureau's policy work.
The OCC has chosen to model some of its work after the FCA, including consideration of “bank-run pilots, sandboxes, whatever you want to call them,” Friend said.
Friend shared how the former OCC Comptroller Thomas Curry, who stepped down in May, expressed concerns about using the term “sandboxes” because he thought “that might provide a safe harbor [for fintech participants], with respect to consumer harm.”
“I don't think that's the way sandboxes really work but we've been calling them 'pilots' and we're working on what we would be comfortable with,” she explained. “We view bank-run pilots as a way to gather information useful to us as a way to share our perspective with banks that may be engaging in some type of innovation before they get too far down the road. So we're looking at … bank-fintech partnerships in the piloting program.”
Friend said the agency does not have a set time frame in mind of when the pilot could be introduced, only that “it's something the Office of Innovation has been looking at.” Some of their considerations with the pilot are: “What kind of piloting program would we be comfortable with? What would sort of serve our need for information and would also provide value to the companies that are engaged in the pilot?”
Contact Stephanie Forshee at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readTesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250