Are Compliance & Privacy the Enemies of Innovation?
While many industries have experienced high adoption rates in cloud based security solutions, financial services has traditionally been the more hesitate…
September 05, 2017 at 07:47 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While many industries have experienced high adoption rates in cloud based security solutions, financial services has traditionally been the more hesitate sector, with concerns with compliance and data security. However, these concerns and hesitations have hindered financial/bank/hedge fund providers from accessing more innovation in data protection. But, is this changing?
Some say “yes” as some security providers are starting to see an increase in uptake in cloud solutions from financial services organizations – who are finally overriding their fears-of-the-cloud and taking that leap of faith into the new world of security.
Kurt Long, CEO and Founder of FairWarning, recently sat down with Inside Counsel for an exclusive interview. He shared why the “wall of fear” in financial services is finally coming down, his predictions on why financial services will surpass healthcare cloud security adoptions, the new cloud technologies in privacy and compliance for financial providers that has made this sector more open to the technology. Cloud security fears stem from the fact that data is the most valuable and business critical asset for the finance industry, so mass data loss is a primary fear when it comes to cloud technologies.
“With mounting regulatory laws, organizations are concerned with maintaining proper security in a cloud based environment,” he explained. “Fear of updating outdated legacy applications when migrating to a cloud based environment is perceived risky for financial services firms who believe it will be costly and time consuming to update their systems.”
According to Long, the “wall of fear” is finally coming down for financial services providers because of the updates in cloud technologies. Cloud technologies now include security features like encryption, tokenization, strong authentication, and the ability to produce event monitoring files. In addition, organizations are finding that cloud technologies can be an asset to their security posture, helping them comply with industry regulations.
“Fierce competition from new fin-tech businesses have also pushed organizations towards cloud adoption,” he said. “These new businesses are immediately leveraging the advantages of cloud based technologies and providing customers with the transparency and instant information they now crave. Financial firms have no choice but to update old legacy systems and leverage cloud technologies to be competitive in the marketplace.”
Today, compliance and privacy enable innovation, according to Long. In fact, the role of security is to build trust between employees and systems so that they can build upon their work in a secure and scalable way. “Governance, if done correctly, applies similarly in that it is checking to make sure that there is a trust enabled environment for customers and employees that is repeatable.”
Per Long, there are five key benefits contingent on choosing a cloud provider that takes security seriously. First, partnering with a cloud security vendor that is security centric will allow organizations to maintain up to date patches. Second, agile cloud security providers are able absorb customer feedback and provide rapid releases at scale, with a click of a button. Third, cloud security providers are now responsible for application service levels, allowing for full transparency between vendor customer regarding the application's performance and its IT needs. Next, in the competitive cloud security vendor ecosystem, organizations now have more choices when it comes to choosing a cloud security provider that provides the most value to their organization.
Finally, Long said, “Your overall security posture is not just your immediate organization, but your entire business network. Choosing a cloud security provider that not only maintains your overall security posture, but also strengthens it can provide immense value to your business.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250