Is Free Wi-Fi a Threat for Businesses?
As the Internet has become a crucial part of everyday life, so too has the need to access it virtually anytime, anywhere. As a result, more businesses…
September 08, 2017 at 10:52 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As the Internet has become a crucial part of everyday life, so too has the need to access it virtually anytime, anywhere. As a result, more businesses are offering free Wi-Fi and more consumers are willing to connect to it. Unfortunately, these unsecure Wi-Fi networks and apps with privacy vulnerabilities make personal information and company data easily accessible by cybercriminals.
David Thomas, founder and CEO of Evident ID, Inc. and an accomplished cybersecurity entrepreneur, sat down with Inside Counsel to share the questionable behaviors–like using free Wi-Fi–that might be leading to the increase in data breaches, whether businesses need to rethink the BYOD approach and the lengths businesses will need to go in order to protect personal data in the future.
Today, businesses may need to hold large amounts of personal data to verify individuals' credentials, licenses etc. This data repository makes it a prime target for hackers that may use a variety of ways to hack into this database. Unsecure Wi-Fi networks is just one method of compromising this data which can lead to major legal and financial liabilities.
“If there is a way for companies to interact with consumers without having to share or exchange or transfer personal data, it will not give hackers a place to attack it,” explained Thomas. “Instead of targeting and hacking a large database of personal data, they must try to hack millions of personal device of each consumer to get that data.”
Evident brings peace of mind to every personal data interaction ensuring that the data stays stored on the individuals' devices making it very difficult for hackers. Businesses protect themselves against data breaches by limiting the amount of data they store and must secure. By leveraging cloud based encryption, it mitigates the risk of having a customer database hacked.
In the future, business will need to adopt secure, simplified solutions that allow businesses and individuals to share verified personal data. Personal data has consistently been a reliable source for validating a person's identity – driver's licenses, credit history, social security numbers, and birth certificates are all forms of identification that authenticate individuals to companies. While accessing authentic information may have been possible, the interactions have been complicated, time consuming and likely inefficient for everyone involved.
“Companies are investing more time and energy to effectively acquire, manage and protect the personal information of their users and workforce to the detriment of their own business focus,” he said. “Additionally, the regulatory requirements and liability that accompany any interaction with personal data continue to increase, putting additional strain on businesses to stay current in their efforts and information. As the use of personal data grows, the need for an innovative, more secure solution to protect personal data becomes even greater.”
From a user perspective, as individuals are asked to provide their information more broadly, security concerns and a loss of control become more prevalent, possibly even putting once standard interactions at risk, according to Thomas. Individuals are looking for an easy way to manage their personal information with minimal friction and energy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250